Ty's mother has an Permissive type of parenting style.
<u>Answer:
</u>
In the context of Supreme Court conferences, the statement that is true of a dissenting opinion is that it is expressed by a judge or justice who disagrees with the majority opinion.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When a case is heard by a bench of multiple justices sitting in odd numbers, there is a possibility that there is a difference of opinion among the judges regarding the decision to be given in the case.
- In such instances, the decision which is given by the majority of judges is deemed to be final, but the judges who do not agree with the decision given have the right to express their dissent in writing.
I think all of those places are in Greece.
Answer: The trial judge must raise the issue of competence because the Constitution obligates her to do so.
Explanation:
When a trial starts, it must be verified that the offender has the psychological competence to understand why he is being accused, or to respond to the crime that is accused. Therefore, in the case of suspecting that the accused has psychological problems, it is the responsibility of the judge to request a psychological and psychiatric evaluation before continuing with the trial.
I hope this information can help you.
