All categories

3 years ago

Please help!!!!! Math is very confusing and this makes no sense

Mathematics

1 answer:

vodomira [7]3 years ago

5 0

The missing figure is attached down

The length around the outside of the track is about 431 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

A running track has the shape of a rectangle capped with a semicircle on each end

The track is 80 feet wide
The rectangular portion of the track is 90 feet tall

We need to estimate the length around the outside of the track

The length of the outside the track is the length of two semi-circle and two straight lengths of the rectangle

∵ The track is 80 feet wide

- From the figure the width of the track is the diameter of the

semi-circles

∴ The diameter of each semi-circle = 80 feet

∵ The radius of a circle is half its diameter

∴ The radius of each semi-circle = $\frac{1}{2}$ × 80 = 40 feet

∵ The length of a circle = 2πr

∴ The length of a semi-circle = πr

∴ The length of two semi-circle = 2 × πr

- Substitute r by 40

∴ The length of two semi-circle = 2 × π(40) = 80π feet

∵ The rectangular portion of the track is 90 feet tall

∴ The length of the rectangle = 90 feet

∴ The two straight parts of the track = 2 × 90 = 180 feet

- Add the length of the two semi-circles and the two straight

parts to find the length of the track

∵ Length of the track = 80π + 180

- Substitute π by 3.141

∴ Length of the track = 80(3.141) + 180

∴ Length of the track = 431.28 ≅ 431 feet

The length around the outside of the track is about 431 feet

Learn more:

You can learn more about the circle in brainly.com/question/1952668

#LearnwithBrainly

You might be interested in

Help! Algebra!!!

balandron [24]

Thet contradict each other, that's why both of them are incorrect.
<span>Suppose that a polynomial has four roots: s, t, u, and v. If the polynomial were evaluated at any of these values, it would have to be zero. Therefore, the polynomial can be written in this form.

p(x)(x - s)(x - t)(x - u)(x - v), where p(x) is some non-zero polynomial

This polynomial has a degree of at least 4. It therefore cannot be cubic.

Now prove Kelsey correct. We have already proved that there can be no more than three roots. To prove that a cubic polynomial with three roots is possible, all we have to do is offer a single example of that. This one will do.

(x - 1)(x - 2)(x - 3)

This is a cubic polynomial with three roots, and four or more roots are not possible for a cubic polynomial. Kelsey is correct.

Incidentally, if this is a roller coaster we are discussing, then a cubic polynomial is not such a good idea, either for a vertical curve or a horizontal curve. I hope this helps</span><span>
</span>

4 0

3 years ago

Ashley is making $500 a week at her job . She receives a 20 percent pay raise. A year later she takes a 5 percent cut. How much

MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

$570

Step-by-step explanation:

500 * 1.2 = $600 after 20% pay raise

600 * .95 = $570 after 5% pay cut

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers