Which best explains how the Democratic Party was formed in the 1820s? The Federalists had become too weak to defeat the Republic
ans, so many politicians wanted to form a new party. The War of 1812 left the United States with only one political party, and many citizens felt a new party needed to be formed quickly. Andrew Jackson wanted to become a member of the “eastern aristocracy” and felt forming a new political party was the best approach. Andrew Jackson felt betrayed by his loss in 1824 and wanted to create a political party for the “common people.”
Andrew Jackson felt betrayed by his loss in 1824 and wanted to create a political party for the “common people.”
Explanation:
In 1824 the Democratic-Republican Party, which ruled the United States since the early nineteenth century, entered into crisis. Four candidates for the presidency were presented, including General Andrew Jackson, who won the most votes, but did not reach the majority. The House of Representatives decided in favor of John Quincy Adams, according to Jackson and his followers, unfairly. Four years later, the "Jacksonian" party won the victory of the popular Anglo-American War hero of 1812. The inauguration shocked the political elite, who saw a crowd of poor people arrive in the White House gardens . In 1832 the new president's party officially became the Democratic Party.
The system of government by privileged citizens or the upper class is called an "aristocracy," with the leaders in question usually having the most money of anyone in the society as well.
<span>A. They both attempted to preserve the
Union. Both compromise sought to satisfy both pro-slavery and anti-slavery
factions in government. Both sought to find ways to ensure that there was a
balance between the two sides. The
Kansas-Nebraska Act however, destroyed that balance and later led to Civil War.</span>
This would be matrilineal, where the line of the mother was the relevant line, and not of the father: in order to be a king, one needed to have the royal mother and the father was irrelevant. The dynasty would be traced by the female line in this case (even if the kings were the rulers).
