Answer:
- x < 2.5
- x > 2.5
Step-by-step explanation:
One way to do this is to try a number for x and see if it makes the inequality true. A suitable number here is x=0. This value of x is less than 2.5.
<h3>1.</h3>
For x=0, you have ...
5 > -5 . . . . . true; the solution space is x < 2.5
__
<h3>2.</h3>
For x=0, you have ...
-25 > -5(2.5)
-25 > -12.5 . . . . . false; the solution space is x > 2.5
_____
<em>Alternate solution</em>
<h3>1.</h3>
Subtract 5:
-4x > -10
Divide by -4
x < 2.5
__
<h3>2.</h3>
Divide by -5:
5 < x +2.5
Subtract 2.5
2.5 < x
x > 2.5
Answer:
it could be that x is 4 and y 3
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
B. There is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
Step-by-step explanation:
Based on the above picture, for the nutritionist to determine whether there is an association between where food is prepared and the number of calories the food contains, there must be an association between two categorical variables.
The conditions that satisfy whether there exists an association between conditional relative frequencies are:
1. When there is a bigger difference in the conditional relative frequencies, the stronger the association between the variables.
2. When the conditional relative frequencies are nearly equal for all categories, there may be no association between the variables.
For the given conditional relative frequency, we can see that there exists a significant difference between the columns of the table in the picture because 0.15 is significantly different from 0.55 and 0.85 is significantly different from 0.45
We can conclude that there is an association because the value 0.15 is not similar to the value 0.55
Answer:
2
Step-by-step explanation:
Since if it's 5 or higher you go up but if it's 4 or lower you stay the same. And since 2.36 doesn't have the .5 it would round to 2
