1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sveta [45]
3 years ago
8

How did helping the Taliban defeat Russia during the Afghanistan War help the Taliban in their efforts to resist United Nations

forces today?
In your opinion, is helping the "lesser of two evils" a sound foreign policy decision, or should the United States allow warring nations to decide matters for themselves?
History
2 answers:
quester [9]3 years ago
6 0

How did helping the Taliban defeat Russia during the Afghanistan War help the Taliban in their efforts to resist United Nations forces today?Helping the terrorists, the US ended up financing arms purchases, hatred of the West, training and ideological expansion. Today, US investment (which has already been deposited on bin Laden himself), contemplates on the terrorist resistance and the deaths of thousands of people.There are piles of reasons the Soviet Union lost their war in Afghanistan. By asking "how did the Taliban defeat Russia" you are trying to lead my answer, which I will not allow you to perform. The Taliban did not wholly defeat The the Soviet Union and their retirement and subsequent withdrawal were caused by multiple genes.This new transparency brought increased critical to the efforts in Afghanistan. Additionally, this "war by proxy" between the Soviets and Americans (thru the Mujahadeen) was regarded as an anachronism in the historic period of Glasnost and Perestroika. The Soviets merely admitted that they were in no attitude to win a war in that country (as the British had made out twice and the Americans will fare in the near future) and if they hanged on it would be at the disbursement of their more pressing domestic issues as easily as new international relationships (oh Gorby) and they also had a large group without any aid.




In your opinion, is helping the "lesser of two evils" a sound foreign policy decision, or should the United States allow warring nations to decide matters for themselves?Our forefathers supported France in its war against England, and then let's not turn them into something they were not. As Machiavelli advised, It is always beneficial for states to endorse the lesser of two evils, though the extent of involvement has to be carefully selected.

For representative, US support for Jihadists in Afghanistan in the 1980s seemed like a smart policy at the time because it helped bring down the Soviet Union. But there is no way we could have predicted the horrible results of this conclusion once the smoke cleared. One manner to avert these sorts of problems is to use international institutions like the UN to intervene so that no individual state can be blamed later if things get bad. It may sound cynical, but it's the creation we exist in.

Nostrana [21]3 years ago
5 0
My opinion would be if the US was allies with anybody else in the world then we should use it to our advantage. because the US is deeply in debt to some countries so maybe the more we help them in times like that... then just maybe we can keep them off our backs. 

You might be interested in
What best describes one lasting effect of the watergate scandal?.
frez [133]
Which best describes one lasting effect of the Watergate scandal?

Many Americans lost faith in their government and became cynical about politics
5 0
3 years ago
What was the mood of the country after the war of 1812
Gwar [14]
Americans were happy to not technically lose to the British even though it was a draw
3 0
4 years ago
What era was Marbury vs Madison in?
Hoochie [10]
They are in the era of the 1800's.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a royal power abolished by the English Bill of Rights?
ASHA 777 [7]
<span>The English Bill of Rights limited the power of the monarch (King) and gave more power to the common citizen. (Do not confuse with the Magna Carta, it only gave power to nobles.)</span>
6 0
3 years ago
What was the ray cat solution?
vesna_86 [32]

Answer:

it was a documentary

Explanation:

Their solution consisted of two steps: Engineer a cat that changes colour in response to radiation. Create a culture around this cat, such that if your cat changes colour, you should move someplace else

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did most black children receive an inadequate education in the antebellum period?
    12·1 answer
  • Buddhism teaches that it is wrong to desire which of the following?
    9·2 answers
  • Restrictions under the magna carta
    9·1 answer
  • Under which circumstance is Congress most likely to pass a bill the president has threatened to veto?
    6·2 answers
  • Describe two features of Richard's crusade to the holy land (4 marks)
    11·1 answer
  • Which statement best describes the effect of stress acting on the rook shown
    6·2 answers
  • Why did Egypt nationalize the Suez Canal? (A)To try to make more money for themselves (B)To make up the money lost from USA and
    13·1 answer
  • 2. On which items did the Roman Catholic Church and the Greek Orthodox Church disagree? Select all that apply.
    7·1 answer
  • Speech would NOT be protected by the Constitution if...
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the Egyptians mummify their dead?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!