Answer:
No, it is not.
Explanation:
Looking at this chart, this looks to me to be a case of an x-linked recessive disease. (If you want to know how to tell, or got some context that this is not the case, let me know)
Remember that females have two x chromosomes and males have one x and one y chromosome. As this disease is recessive, this means that for a female to exhibit the disease, she must have both x chromosomes have the disease. If she only has one x chromosome with the disease, she's considered a carrier.
On the other hand, males are completely binary, as they only have one x chromosome - either their x chromosome has the disease, and they exhibit it, or their x chromosome does not, and they do not have the disease, nor do they carry it. Thus, males can also not be carriers.
A square on the chart is representative of a male, while a circle is a female. IV-2 is a square, thus he is a male. This means that he cannot be a carrier, so your answer is no.
If any of this doesn't make sense, feel free to let me know! Hope this helps.
Answer:
The given statement is True
Explanation:
A foetus is a life that is conceived by a woman to give birth. Though biologically it won’t be considered as a person but it is definitely a living entity that will become a new life of a person. So being a living organism it definitely has the right to live.
According to the Article 67 of Fetal Rights it is said that a foetus should be considered born from the moment it is being conceived by the mother.
It would be placer because you are not digging up any ground..if that is not right it might be none because if you are messing with water environments you are still messing with it which could not be good
The archean era i think am i right?
