What was one consequence of demobilization directly following world war 1

2 answers:

8 0

One of the principal consequence of demobilization directly following world war I were the changes in the economy, now the countries had to change a "war economy" into a "civil economy", the need to generate new jobs for the ones that came back from the war became a reality, and the government had to make decisions to answer that need.

Misha Larkins [42]3 years ago

4 0

1) goods that had been in short supply during the war became plentiful. 2) millions of jobs in defense industries were created. 3)unemployment was high and wages were falling. 4) farm prices were higher and crops made record profits for farmers. Hope this helps. :-)

You might be interested in

Please answer!!!

Eduardwww [97]

c)free-soilers and slavery advocates

6 0

3 years ago

What was a Democratic Party argument against the building of transportation systems by the federal government?

fiasKO [112]

The plan would result in domination of the country by special interests

3 0

3 years ago

Who is not a contributor to Europe's cultural landscape in literature, art or music?

jarptica [38.1K]

ANSWER: Martin Luther. Good luck

5 0

4 years ago

How did the women in the military contribute to the war effort?

Elina [12.6K]

Answer:I would say b

Explanation:

because they were kept out of the direct line of fire since the men didnt think that they could do as much work such as the women being nurses

i hope this helps i dont know what the cotent you are reading this for

5 0

3 years ago

Which statement from Martin Luther's 95 Theses do you feel had the greatest impact on the Protestant Reformation? Explain your r

poizon [28]

Answer:

Fifty years ago my friends and I had a party where we read and toasted each of the 95 theses so at one point I certainly read ’em all, though granted the effect of all those shots, I don’t recall the higher numbered ones very well. In any case, don’t think the theses, which are focused on indulgences, are a very clear statement of Luther’s theology. After all, in 1517, Luther didn’t realize he was instigating the Reformation; and the full statement of salvation by faith alone and the rest came later. What made the Theses matter wasn’t doctrinal. One of the major factors in the Reformation was resentment of the financial burden the Roman church put on the German people—the indulgences were sold to finance the building of Saint Peter’s cathedral. Whatever purely religious motives the German princes had in supporting Luther’s rebellion, they definitely liked the idea of not shipping money off to Rome. The prospect of secularizing the monasteries was mighty welcome as well. No princely support, no Reformation.

I’m definitely going for thesis 62 — “The true treasure of the church, is the most holy gospel of the glory and grace of God”

Rome and the Reformers both taught that a man is justified by God’s work of grace, but, it is all important to see the real contrast between the Roman and the Reformation faiths. ROME taught — justification by God’s work of grace in man emphasizing the work of God in us and our co-operation with that work.

The REFORMATION — taught that man is Justified by God’s work of grace in Christ, emphasizing what God does for us in Christ, without our co-operation.

Explanation:

that^^

6 0

4 years ago