1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SIZIF [17.4K]
3 years ago
9

Do you think DNA fingerprint evidence from a person convicted of a misdemeanor “going too far”? Explain why or why not.

Law
2 answers:
denpristay [2]3 years ago
7 0
Answer: no
Explanation: whatever needs to be done to solve a crime, take those steps. fingerprinting is not going “too far”. dealing with misdemeanor crimes you have to be careful to not miss any evidence. if you were to not collect a fingerprint, you may miss out on finding the suspect. fingerprints can be a win, loose situation. either way, you should always try to get one if you can if it means it may lead you to the suspect.
slavikrds [6]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Definitely not. Misdemeanors may range in severity levels (taking into mind that your location may classify crimes differently from others). There are common misdemeanors, such as vandalism, trespass, reckless driving, etc... and there are more serious & severe crimes such as domestic violence charges, assault and battery, shoplifting. All of these are misdemeanors, yet some of these charges likewise assault or domestic violence charges is still classified as simply a common misdemeanor. Your question pertains to using DNA evidence for convicting lawbreakers. Let's keep in mind that DNA evidence is sought to be extremely accurate and reliable meaning with DNA evidence, you will most-definitely be able to prove a point. It's good to have a trust-worthy source that us humans can depend on when trying to prove something that may be detrimental or glorifying. This will help limit the amount of false-charges, especially of more severe misdemeanors (as such assault and battery) and actually show that the system we use, is organized, attested, and safe. No matter the crime justice should be served, and that justice should steam from a fair, and accurate, yet strict system.

You might be interested in
Describe what the chain of command is and its purpose in the investigation.
Katena32 [7]

Answer:

The exact definition for chain of command when it comes to evidence is the witnessed and written record of everyone who came in contact with the evidence and had unbroken control of it. Following the chain of command ensures that the evidence collected at the scene is the same evidence that is entered in the courtroom.

Does this help?

5 0
3 years ago
¿cómo se exige el derecho a la vida?
AlexFokin [52]

Answer:

El derecho a la vida se exige constantemente, a través del propio ejercicio de este derecho. A su vez, el ejercicio del derecho a la vida como derecho natural inherente a todo ser humano se da a través del ejercicio de los otros dos derechos naturales fundamentales: la libertad y la búsqueda de la felicidad. Así, el derecho a la vida se exige viviendo plenamente, en libertad y buscando constantemente la felicidad propia y de nuestros seres queridos.

A su vez, el derecho a la vida también se exige incluyendo el respeto por este derecho en leyes fundamentales como constituciones nacionales y tratados de derechos humanos, que reconozcan este derecho como esencial a la condición humana.

4 0
3 years ago
Which ring would be better for everyday wear
user100 [1]

Answer:

I think personally the black one looks better

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Government Question - What can a President do when working with a Congress that is not very cooperative?
djverab [1.8K]
The president can set certain rules, instructions and regulations- Those do not require approval by the Congress
5 0
3 years ago
The end result of rescinding the contract is
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer:

It is sometimes called “cancellation” or “overturning”. The word rescission comes from the word “rescind” which means to cancel or annul. The purpose of contract rescission is to restore the parties to their original status before the contract was made (the “status quo ante”).

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • i just made this account and forgot the password and im subscribed to plus and the change password isnt sending a mail to my ema
    5·2 answers
  • Which term describes a formal statement naming the plaintiff and the defendant and describing the nature of a civil lawsuit?
    6·2 answers
  • Can someone help me ???​
    6·1 answer
  • Minh-Tam is a lawyer whose client told her he was guilty. The client is insistent on testifying, but Minh-Tam believes she will
    14·1 answer
  • An army general forces your family to let him and a few of his men stay in your house.
    6·2 answers
  • H e l p pleaseeee is due in 30 min
    15·1 answer
  • What is sector 320?<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • True or False. During the 1980s and 1990s and the "get-tough” movement,
    10·1 answer
  • Drivers education - Unit 3
    10·1 answer
  • What is it called when a state grants a city the ability to govern its own local affairs?.
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!