Do you think DNA fingerprint evidence from a person convicted of a misdemeanor “going too far”? Explain why or why not.

2 answers:

7 0

Answer: no
Explanation: whatever needs to be done to solve a crime, take those steps. fingerprinting is not going “too far”. dealing with misdemeanor crimes you have to be careful to not miss any evidence. if you were to not collect a fingerprint, you may miss out on finding the suspect. fingerprints can be a win, loose situation. either way, you should always try to get one if you can if it means it may lead you to the suspect.

slavikrds [6]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Definitely not. Misdemeanors may range in severity levels (taking into mind that your location may classify crimes differently from others). There are common misdemeanors, such as vandalism, trespass, reckless driving, etc... and there are more serious & severe crimes such as domestic violence charges, assault and battery, shoplifting. All of these are misdemeanors, yet some of these charges likewise assault or domestic violence charges is still classified as simply a common misdemeanor. Your question pertains to using DNA evidence for convicting lawbreakers. Let's keep in mind that DNA evidence is sought to be extremely accurate and reliable meaning with DNA evidence, you will most-definitely be able to prove a point. It's good to have a trust-worthy source that us humans can depend on when trying to prove something that may be detrimental or glorifying. This will help limit the amount of false-charges, especially of more severe misdemeanors (as such assault and battery) and actually show that the system we use, is organized, attested, and safe. No matter the crime justice should be served, and that justice should steam from a fair, and accurate, yet strict system.

You might be interested in

What is law ?<br>__________

aniked [119]

Explanation:

the system of rules which a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and which it may enforce by the imposition of penalties.

"shooting the birds is against the law"

2 a rule defining correct procedure or behaviour in a sport.

"the laws of the game"

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The day had begun on a bright note. The sun finally peeked through the rain for the first time in a week, and the birds were sin

adell [148]

It’s since November hope this helps

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

As an entrepreneur, you’ll face lots of tough and sometimes ethical decisions. In the situation described below, what do you thi

Kay [80]

Answer:

idk

Explanation:idk

6 0

3 years ago

What is the extremely hot layer that is made almost entirely of solid iron?

andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer: inner core

The inner core is the deepest and hottest layer of the Earth. It is made almost entirely of metal—mostly iron and, while extremely hot (9,000-13,000 degrees Fahrenheit--or 5,000-7,000 C), it is solid. It's almost 750 miles thick! Next the outer core is made mostly of iron and nickel.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The underlying principle behind the principle of stair decisis is _

myrzilka [38]

Answer:

Binding precedent relies on the legal principle of stare decisis.

Explanation:

Stare decisis is a legal doctrine that obligates courts to follow historical cases when making a ruling on a similar case.

Stare decisis means to stand by things decided. It ensures certainty and consistency in the application of law.

4 0

3 years ago