1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SIZIF [17.4K]
2 years ago
9

Do you think DNA fingerprint evidence from a person convicted of a misdemeanor “going too far”? Explain why or why not.

Law
2 answers:
denpristay [2]2 years ago
7 0
Answer: no
Explanation: whatever needs to be done to solve a crime, take those steps. fingerprinting is not going “too far”. dealing with misdemeanor crimes you have to be careful to not miss any evidence. if you were to not collect a fingerprint, you may miss out on finding the suspect. fingerprints can be a win, loose situation. either way, you should always try to get one if you can if it means it may lead you to the suspect.
slavikrds [6]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Definitely not. Misdemeanors may range in severity levels (taking into mind that your location may classify crimes differently from others). There are common misdemeanors, such as vandalism, trespass, reckless driving, etc... and there are more serious & severe crimes such as domestic violence charges, assault and battery, shoplifting. All of these are misdemeanors, yet some of these charges likewise assault or domestic violence charges is still classified as simply a common misdemeanor. Your question pertains to using DNA evidence for convicting lawbreakers. Let's keep in mind that DNA evidence is sought to be extremely accurate and reliable meaning with DNA evidence, you will most-definitely be able to prove a point. It's good to have a trust-worthy source that us humans can depend on when trying to prove something that may be detrimental or glorifying. This will help limit the amount of false-charges, especially of more severe misdemeanors (as such assault and battery) and actually show that the system we use, is organized, attested, and safe. No matter the crime justice should be served, and that justice should steam from a fair, and accurate, yet strict system.

You might be interested in
Nellie Lumpkin, who suffered from dementia, was admitted to the Picayune Convalescent Center, a nursing home. Because of her men
zmey [24]

Answer:

In this case, as in Vicksburg Partners, “since the arbitration clause is a part of a contract (the nursing home admissions agreement) evidencing in the aggregate economic activity affecting interstate commerce, the Federal Arbitration Act is applicable․

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following forensic units is responsible for examining the
marishachu [46]

Answer:

the ballistics unit?

Explanation:

what are the options?

3 0
2 years ago
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

the right to  a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of .......

Explanation:

this is what i was thought

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP ASAP!! -quiz- 2.
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer:

O a passenger assisting a driver.

Explanation:

Having a designated texter when driving is an example of a passenger assisting a driver when an urgent text or message comes up and is needed to be answered immediately.

Hope this helps!

5 0
2 years ago
The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called __________. Multiple Choice stare dec
mario62 [17]

The ideas and philosophies that explain the origin of law and its justification are called  <u>jurisprudence</u><u>.</u> It is the concept that differentiates public from private law.

What holds true about jurisprudence?

Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law. Several theories that assist explain the beginnings of law and its justification have evolved over the years. These legal theories (or philosophies) are referred to as jurisprudence. Jurisprudence is not the law itself but a philosophy of the law.

Positive law jurisprudence:

It thinks that law is only the state's orders enforced through force. Proper law Jurisprudence holds that the only thing that constitutes law is the state's orders accompanied by force and penalties. It runs counter to the natural law school of thought.

Learn more about jurisprudence here:

brainly.com/question/14612573

#SPJ4

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Whichofthefollowingisadiscoverydeviceusedinvirtuallyeverymedicalmalpracticecase?*a.Subpoenafordocumentsb.Requestforphysicalormen
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements accurately describes the idea of representative government? A) Electing legislators to pass le
    12·1 answer
  • When Congress passes a law, it can be found in which publication? a. United States Congressional Studies b. United States Statut
    15·1 answer
  • The president meets with other heads of state at the annual G20 conference - in which role is the president acting in?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following would cause the value of a nation's GDP to increase in a given year?
    7·1 answer
  • This philosopher did not like monarchies?
    6·1 answer
  • ¿cuales son las principales autoridades en mexico?
    6·2 answers
  • Discuss the interesting aspects of the poem "government driver on his retirement​
    13·1 answer
  • Instituciones de despenalización y suspension de la ejecucion de la pena
    9·1 answer
  • DNA evidence is typically easy to find at a crime scene.<br> True<br> False
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!