1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SIZIF [17.4K]
2 years ago
9

Do you think DNA fingerprint evidence from a person convicted of a misdemeanor “going too far”? Explain why or why not.

Law
2 answers:
denpristay [2]2 years ago
7 0
Answer: no
Explanation: whatever needs to be done to solve a crime, take those steps. fingerprinting is not going “too far”. dealing with misdemeanor crimes you have to be careful to not miss any evidence. if you were to not collect a fingerprint, you may miss out on finding the suspect. fingerprints can be a win, loose situation. either way, you should always try to get one if you can if it means it may lead you to the suspect.
slavikrds [6]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Definitely not. Misdemeanors may range in severity levels (taking into mind that your location may classify crimes differently from others). There are common misdemeanors, such as vandalism, trespass, reckless driving, etc... and there are more serious & severe crimes such as domestic violence charges, assault and battery, shoplifting. All of these are misdemeanors, yet some of these charges likewise assault or domestic violence charges is still classified as simply a common misdemeanor. Your question pertains to using DNA evidence for convicting lawbreakers. Let's keep in mind that DNA evidence is sought to be extremely accurate and reliable meaning with DNA evidence, you will most-definitely be able to prove a point. It's good to have a trust-worthy source that us humans can depend on when trying to prove something that may be detrimental or glorifying. This will help limit the amount of false-charges, especially of more severe misdemeanors (as such assault and battery) and actually show that the system we use, is organized, attested, and safe. No matter the crime justice should be served, and that justice should steam from a fair, and accurate, yet strict system.

You might be interested in
This system of government where power lies with the legislative body and the chief executive (leader) is part of
Blababa [14]
Parliamentary i think :)
3 0
3 years ago
Clause that says federal laws are superior to state laws. Which clause is this referring to?
olga55 [171]
The answer is the supremacy clause.

Hope this helps!
7 0
3 years ago
Which is which? eastern state penitentiary & perspective of Pentonville Prison
Liula [17]
Umm ummmmmm ion kno
8 0
3 years ago
What is it known as when both the federal government and state government share a particular power?
levacccp [35]

Answer:

Federalism describes the system of shared governance between national and state governments.

Explanation:

Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

8 0
2 years ago
Based on the author's description,which best describes the writer that Jamal needs
Anit [1.1K]

Answer:

The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:

After lunch, the junior representatives listened to an author read from her work. Jamal’s mom had given him some money to get a souvenir of his big day, and jamal decided to buy the author’s book. When she was done with her presentation, jamal approached her and asked if she had any copies for sale. The woman gave him a copy for free and even wrote an inscription inside. She wrote, "I hope you had a blast during the conference. I wish I had someone as ambitious as you working on my campaign. Jamal was touched by her words. He shook the woman’s hand and went back to join the other junior representatives. Based on the author’s description, which word best describes the writer that jamal meets?

a) careless

b) generous

c) demanding

d) disappointing

The answer is b): generous.

Explanation:

The answer is “generous” because when Jamal approached the writer, he likely intended to buy a copy of the writer’s book. However, the writer, a woman, gave Jamal a copy of her book for free, and also inspired him by inscribing the following words inside the book: “I wish I had someone as ambitious as you working on my campaign”. These two acts from the writer point to the fact that the writer was generous with her book, and words of inspiration.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can a 14 year old have a fishing license in Kentucky
    10·2 answers
  • What is a definition of vested interest?
    13·1 answer
  • What is law.what is constitutional law and mercantille law
    9·1 answer
  • Why is the right to a jury trial guaranteed by the Bill of Rights? Why might someone choose not to have a jury trial?
    6·1 answer
  • The largest source of new law comes from court decisions. True or False
    12·1 answer
  • Create one Criminal Justice related scenario using Deductive and Inductive<br> Reasoning
    10·1 answer
  • Bob ross is a good person but not so amazing that you have to be absolutely OBSESSED with him right?
    10·1 answer
  • The life cycle of the
    8·1 answer
  • In AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
    5·1 answer
  • Which was a result of the interaction between European Settlers and Native Americans?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!