Do you think DNA fingerprint evidence from a person convicted of a misdemeanor “going too far”? Explain why or why not.

2 answers:

7 0

Answer: no
Explanation: whatever needs to be done to solve a crime, take those steps. fingerprinting is not going “too far”. dealing with misdemeanor crimes you have to be careful to not miss any evidence. if you were to not collect a fingerprint, you may miss out on finding the suspect. fingerprints can be a win, loose situation. either way, you should always try to get one if you can if it means it may lead you to the suspect.

slavikrds [6]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Definitely not. Misdemeanors may range in severity levels (taking into mind that your location may classify crimes differently from others). There are common misdemeanors, such as vandalism, trespass, reckless driving, etc... and there are more serious & severe crimes such as domestic violence charges, assault and battery, shoplifting. All of these are misdemeanors, yet some of these charges likewise assault or domestic violence charges is still classified as simply a common misdemeanor. Your question pertains to using DNA evidence for convicting lawbreakers. Let's keep in mind that DNA evidence is sought to be extremely accurate and reliable meaning with DNA evidence, you will most-definitely be able to prove a point. It's good to have a trust-worthy source that us humans can depend on when trying to prove something that may be detrimental or glorifying. This will help limit the amount of false-charges, especially of more severe misdemeanors (as such assault and battery) and actually show that the system we use, is organized, attested, and safe. No matter the crime justice should be served, and that justice should steam from a fair, and accurate, yet strict system.

You might be interested in

1.What is meant by executory consideration?A. Consideration provided by an executor.B.The exchange of consideration.Where consid

Marina CMI [18]

Answer:

D, Where there is a promise to do something in the future

I hope this helped at all.

7 0

3 years ago

Discuss why the prison environment is not typically ideal for treatment programs and give examples of ideal environments.

Nadusha1986 [10]

Answer: Prison is not typically ideal for treatment programs because the environment is not set up to help individuals succeed in treatment. Prisons have unwritten rules among inmates, gang activity/violence, non-gang related violence, drug use, sexual violence, and many other factors that make the environment not ideal for those seeking treatment. A better environment would include education, counseling, and healthy surroundings that include other individuals with the same treatment goals as their peers.

Hope this helps!

6 0

3 years ago

Como Dorkin define al derecho

Sonja [21]

Para Dworkin el Derecho consiste en la mejor interpretación argumentativa que justifique y comprenda en su totalidad el sistema jurídico, cuyos argumentos en los tribunales de justicia son inevitablemente cuestiones relativas a las convicciones morales y políticas de los jueces.
Hope that helps.

3 0

3 years ago

Is it bad to give away free brainliest?

Nitella [24]

Answer:

It depends. Do you ask questions? Usually.

And if the answer helps you

Explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following sources of law would be most important for resolving