<span>This idea is known as Manifest Destiny. It made American citizens believe that all the land in North America belonged to them and it was their God given right to claim it as their own. The citizens would use any tactic to claim uncharted territory or territory already being lived on. This idea fueled Western expansion in the United States.</span>
Answer:
Yes, US constantly engaged in military action.
Explanation:
Yes, there has been no declared war since World War II, yet the US has been almost constantly engaged in military action because United States want to control the whole world and main his supremacy. So for that reason, United States is constantly engaged in military actions which cost them a lot on the economy. Congress “authorizing the President to use force” means to use the force for defending its own interests while declaring war is a full fledged war against country or community. President bears more responsibility in each case because he is the head of the country. Declaring war needs more resources and money for the war and soldiers which greatly effect the economy of the country while using force for a particular mission does not need more resources and money so using force is better than declaring war.
The process of checks and balances which <em>make it more likely</em> that a judge, once appointed, will rule impartially is:
- It ensures that there is more than one person, more than one view so any ruling in the future would not be biased to that one view.
<h3>Checks and Balances</h3>
This is the principle that states that the three arms of government, the <em>Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary</em> all have separated powers and <em>checks on the activities</em> of each other so that there would not be tyranny.
<h3>How this helps</h3>
This helps in the appointment of a federal judge as though the President, who is part of the Executive makes a list of federal judges to appoint, it is up to the Congress, part of the Legislature to either <em>accept or reject </em>this nomination and this ensures that the federal judge is <em>not loyal to the president </em>and neglects his duties,
Read more about checks and balances here:
brainly.com/question/8927972
Answer:
Explanation:
La première illusion, en cultivant la définition de la démocratie comme le pouvoir du peuple, crée le mythe de l’autogouvernement selon lequel le peuple s’émanciperait enfin du règne de la domination et de la sphère oppressive du pouvoir. Pour l’auteur cette illusion est bien un mythe qui n’a jamais correspondu à la réalité de la démocratie. Loin d’être un régime dans lequel le peuple en personne gouverne, la démocratie n’est qu’un certain aménagement de l’asymétrie entre gouvernants et gouvernés, asymétrie propre à tout pouvoir. La démocratie n’est donc pas un régime qui aurait le don exceptionnel d’échapper au pouvoir et à la domination. La démocratie conçue comme autogouvernement n’a jamais existé. Elle ne doit pas être non plus un idéal politique, celui d’une société enfin transparente à elle-même et vidée de tout rapport de pouvoir, vers lequel il faudrait tendre. Notre expérience concrète de la démocratie, loin de confirmer la définition de la démocratie comme autogouvernement, l’invalide : nous, le peuple, nous ne gouvernons pas, nous consentons à déléguer notre pouvoir à des représentants. C’est
