Answer:
The correct answer is C. The border between California and Oregon is a thin, black line; this indicates a state boundary.
Explanation:
According to the map and its conventions, the correct option is C. because the line that divides the states of Oregon and California in the west of the country is a thin line that according to the conventions of the map indicates a "State Boundary". Additionally, the other options are not correct, for example, option A. "The border between Texas and Mexico is a thin, black line; this indicates an international boundary" is incorrect because according to the conventions of the map, the "National Boundary" is indicated by two thick and continuous lines; in addition, option B. "The border between California and Oregon is a blue line; this indicates an international boundary" is incorrect because the state limit between Oregon and California is not a State River Boundary; finally, option D. "The border between Texas and Mexico is a thick, black line; this indicates a state boundary" is incorrect because the boundary between Mexico and Texas is an national boundary. So, the correct aswer is C. The border between California and Oregon is a thin, black line; this indicates a state boundary.
HOPE THIS HELPS :)
God loves u !
The correct answer is B) Consolidated corporations gained traction and began to squeeze out smaller business and individuals.
<em>The business practices in the late 1800s and early 1900s consolidated corporations gained traction and began to squeeze out smaller business and individuals.
</em>
The Industrial Revolution created new machines and technology that were used in the fabrics to make mass production more efficient. The problem was that machines replaced the people who elaborated those products in a craft and traditional way. And these mass production has a tremendous advantage that small business did not have.
These new business practices in the late 1800s and early 1900s made consolidated corporations gained traction and began to squeeze out smaller business and individuals. The reason was simple, mass production with the use of new machines created more products at a cheaper price. And small business could not compete against that.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
How does Congress react to Paulson requesting a bailout of US banks totaling over 7 billion dollars?
Congress acted against it, and the House of Representatives voted against Paulson requesting.
Let's remember the moment. It was September 20, 2008, when US Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Paulson, submitted this proposal to the lower house of Congress. The House of Representatives discussed the proposal but considered that it was a tax imposition for US citizens to try to save the bad decisions of the bankers. So on September 29, the House of Representatives voted against the proposal, and immediately the stock changes of the world -including the New York stock exchange, of course- plummeted.
President George W. Bush had to swiftly react and signed the EESA Act (the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 to rescue the financial institutions and banks with $700 billion.
Answer:
Theodore Roosevelt was the 26th president of the United States, from 1901 to 1909
Explanation:
He's regarded as the first modern President of the United States, and the state of today´s influence of the United States Presidency began with him, at a time when Congress was the most powerful branch of government, during the second half of the 1800s. He made the President the center of American politics. He thought that the President had the right to use all powers unless they were specifically denied to him. He was a strong believer that the President should serve as an agent of reform for the people, and was against the predominant notions of limited government. His goal was to make society more fair and equitable, with economic possibilities for all Americans.
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Mandela</em><em> gave a discourse from the litigant's dock. He represented somewhere in the range of three hours, before closing with the regularly </em><em>cited entry "I am set up to die".</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The discourse depicts why the ANC had chosen to go past its past <em>utilization of sacred techniques and Gandhian peaceful opposition,</em> and receive harm against property (intended to limit dangers of damage and passing) as a piece of their activism against the South African government and its Apartheid arrangements <em>(while additionally preparing a military wing for conceivable future use).</em>
