Answer:
A. liable to Will only if the company was grossly negligent
Explanation:
<em>Astor Manufacturing cannot be strictly responsible for Will's injuries since the cause of the accident was the earthquake</em> (C), not because of a company error.
Although the company fulfilled its duty to have the equipment to ensure that the chemicals didn´t explode,<em> it could become responsible so they actually exploded</em> (B)
In the fragment <u>"Jason" is never mentioned as someone who has voluntarily assumed the risk of injury</u>, option (D) makes no sense like an answer.
Therefore, Astor Manufacturing would be liable to Will only if the company had been seriously negligent. This was not the case, <em>but it should also be investigated why the latest generation equipment did not prevent chemicals from exploding.</em>
Explanation:
There could be some advantages and disadvantages associated in buying the car from a dealer or a private seller.
Buying a car from dealer involves more legal regulations. From documentations to the transfers, everything is legally protected. But the disadvantage of buying from dealer is a higher price that the buyer has to pay.
On the contrary, buying car from a private seller might not include all the legal formalities, like the check against any theft, or other legal protections. But the advantage of buying from a private seller is somewhat lower price that the buyer will pay.
So buying from a dealer is legally safe.
France and India are a democracy- the leaders of those counties are democratically elected. Also in England are the leaders in power democratically elected - but there is also the hereditary monarch.
The correct answer is B. Burma (Myanmar) - Myanmar is struggling with democracy and is ruled by the small elite.
I think you're asking 'under what circumstances would it be acceptable for people to overthrow the government?' And that's if the government is oppressive and unjust to its citizens, they have a right to revolt.
