Answer:
Explanation
Explanation is the answer I hoped this helped you!
Answer:
This letter is to ________ (add someone special to you)
I can't explain how grateful I am for you coming into my life with enough words. You have had such a profound influence on my life. Without you, I will not be the person I am today, and I am certain that you would continue to motivate me to become a better version of myself.
Since I know you don't believe in stuff happening for a reason, I'm willing to believe that you were brought into my life for a reason for both of us.
You've shown me that I have a story to tell and that it counts. You've also shown me that my story is valuable to others. I will unlock doors that would otherwise be locked by being genuine and vulnerable. It wasn't until I began honing my skills that I realized what I was missing. I just truly wanted to thank you for being a great ____ {friend} {mom} {sister} {dad} {anyone} -Love _____ { your name}
Explanation:
Everyone can use this letter
Answer:
I'm pretty sure the answer is c or to develop lemme know if I'm wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
The bushes are dancing because:
4. The birds are hopping around in the branches.
Explanation:
The passage we are analyzing here clearly states that it is because of the birds that the bushes seem to be dancing:
<em>[...] and the bushes fairly danced with birds.</em>
<em>[...] as the small gray birds hopped on the swaying branches.</em>
The birds are hopping, stretching their wings, puffing out their chests, all the while making the bushes' branches sway. Why does the author use the word "dancing" to describe the movement of the branches, then? This is a technique called personification. Bushes cannot dance but, by saying so, the author conveys the idea that the way the bushes are moving is beautiful, rhythmic, hypnotizing, just like dancing.
Answer:
4. Should be studying
Explanation:
The predicate is the part of a sentence (or clause) that contains a verb, stating what the subject is doing, or describes the subject.
When we have a main verb and an auxiliary verb accompanying it, both of them together form the predicate. In the given sentence, we have a construction with a main verb<em> to study </em>and an auxiliary verb <em>should:</em> <em>should be studying</em>. If you chose just<em> studying</em> or <em>should be</em> as the predicate, that would be incorrect as those two options are not the complete predicate.
