1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir1956 [14]
3 years ago
5

Pointsvgj fifth.

alt="51562 {?}^{?} " align="absmiddle" class="latex-formula">

​
Law
1 answer:
sergeinik [125]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

What is the question?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Ok raise of hands who wants trump who wants biden and who belives in equaltiy
ahrayia [7]
Hi there. i believe in equality

thanks for the points and have a wonderful day :)
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The most popular mortgage that has a fixed interest rate and<br> a loan period of thirty years?
Kamila [148]

Answer:

Traditional Mortgage

Explanation:

Traditional mortgages are simply constructed, with a mortgagor borrowing money at a fixed or variable interest rate and repaying the debt over time. ... These mortgages have less stringent asset and income restrictions. However, there is a cost: the lender can charge the borrower a higher interest rate.

3 0
3 years ago
If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

7 0
4 years ago
A friend of yours who has watched many Star Trek episodes and movies says, "I thought that black holes pulled everything into th
Akimi4 [234]

Star Trek was a US-based media series based on Gene Roddenberry's science-fiction TV series.

<u>Explanation: </u>

Actually, black holes draw matter to them, and it's no longer detectable when it passes inside the event horizon.   And, when events are near but still outside the event horizon, incredible things happen.  

As a matter of flaws into the black hole on an iron core, the gravitational power of the black hole is accelerated at ever-higher speeds, with gas colliding rising rates, and gas becoming warm.  

Hot gas is the heat emission and is the hot gas emission that we consider as a huge energy production. But all the gas still resides outside the black hole gravitational field.

5 0
4 years ago
Difference between negotiation and mediation
aivan3 [116]

Explanation:

In mediation, parties agree to work together, but under the guidance of a trained mediator. ... Through negotiation, parties are able to bind themselves in an agreement. A mediator, on the other hand, doesn't have decision-making power and doesn't hand down a ruling like an arbitrator or a judge might.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain which type of child care facility James would be best suited for based on the scenario below.
    12·1 answer
  • What if you were able to make changes which assisted in the deterrence of prison violence? Discuss what you would change and why
    6·1 answer
  • When I go into questions that I answered I'm the only one reported?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following units of local government has home rule status under t<br>Constitution?​
    13·1 answer
  • Indentify three differences and three similarities of Senators and Members of the House of Representatives.
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following terms refer to a law that allows individuals to be prosecuted for an action that, when committed, was not
    6·2 answers
  • Joshua is at rank E2 in the Marine Corps. Which of the given statements is true for him? A. He belongs to a junior enlisted rank
    15·1 answer
  • The United states is
    5·1 answer
  • Should the police be given the full power to control itscitizens? Why or why not?
    12·1 answer
  • The british passed the stamp act to replace money they lost during what conflict?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!