1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AveGali [126]
3 years ago
13

If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your

decision?
Law
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

You might be interested in
HELP ME PLSSSSSS ITS FOR A TEST PLSSS HELP
trasher [3.6K]

I’m almost completely sure it B

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Regarding Due Process, Utah Senator Stan Lee quoted __________ who said "arbitrary imprisonment is one of the favorite and most
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

lebron jamesssss           skskskskskskksksksskskksksksksksskkskksks

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
***50 Points*** (Wraith Actual) (Part 1)
Leokris [45]

Answer:

>have no clue in just need more points

6 0
3 years ago
Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is what?
enot [183]

Employee theft coverage inventory will not be reimbursed if the only proof is loss in inventory or land and profit calculation.

<u>Explanation: </u>

An employer or a businessman can claim indemnity or insurance in case his employee commits property theft under the Employee theft coverage. This coverage can help for indemnifying the loss of property, money or securities as result of theft by the employee.

However, inventory shortages are not covered under this cover if the only proof available is profit and loss calculation. But if there is other proof like video of the theft, etc. then such loss can also be covered under this insurance scheme.

4 0
3 years ago
Is it illegal to throw a snowball at someone?
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
Depends on how hard you throw it if you kill them with the snowball you might have some issues but you only put them in a coma you are all g
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Kaileb was eating a deep-fried clam fritter at Flo's Crabshack in Rhode Island (it's a real place!), when a very small piece of
    9·1 answer
  • Assault can be described as
    8·1 answer
  • Choose the answer that best describes when drivers must always yeild to emergency vehicles with lights and sirens on
    6·1 answer
  • when should a practitioner not rely on the work or advise of others, a) when the practitioner is reasonably sure the other perso
    11·1 answer
  • If you cannot see clearly around your car 100 ft in all directions as you approach an intersection, you should:
    9·2 answers
  • Serial killer notes
    5·1 answer
  • What is the oldest branch of the military?
    14·2 answers
  • A low risk environment is a condition when
    14·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following is an act of road rage?
    5·2 answers
  • Television shows like Judge Judy and The People’s Court can offer a distorted view of the judicial process, but they do represen
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!