1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AveGali [126]
3 years ago
13

If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your

decision?
Law
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

You might be interested in
What is the Constitutional issue in the Fisher case? How do you think the Court should decide? Explain your answer.
hichkok12 [17]

Answer:

Fisher sued the University and argued that the use of race as a consideration in the admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The district court held that the University's admissions process was constitutional, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed.

7 0
2 years ago
a fourteen year old boy begins dating a female who is twenty and the two begin sexual relationship.... Has a crime been committe
Virty [35]

Answer:

Yes and no.

Explanation:

Yes because he could have been forced into this.

No because there could be parental consent.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use your understanding of the policy process to put these steps in order.
adelina 88 [10]

Answer:

1. 2) Fishermen report low catch of species for eating.

Fishermen will first report that they were unable to catch much fish.

2. 3) Public hearings are held to determine all the possible solutions.

There will then be a public hearing where the possible reasons and solutions to the fish problem are discussed.

3. 4)Marine scientists count fish population.

As part of the solution, marine scientists will count the populations of fish in the water.

4. 5)The Department of Fish and Game evaluates the repopulation of fisheries.​

Based on this count, the Department of Fish and Game will research to find out how they can repopulate the water bodies.

5. Department of Fish and Game sets limits for fishermen.

As a result of this research, the Department will come up with a limit on the amount of fish that can be caught in a particular period to enable to fish population to rise to a certain level again.

4 0
3 years ago
Puzzle: Murder case
stiks02 [169]

Answer:

it's the wife because if it was anyone else she would've heard them and called the police alot earlier

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How dose law enforcement and the fire department work together
Stels [109]

someone calls 911 the law enforment, then depening on the situation they call the fire demarment or the ambulance or a police officer goes to the location

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • What are some of the differences between the adult and juvenile court processes and systems?
    15·2 answers
  • What does rule of conduct mean?​
    7·2 answers
  • Which of these is an example of separation of powers?
    8·1 answer
  • Define the term gender imbalance and state two negative effects that this may have in the workplace?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following quotes from the Declaration of Independence best reflects the concept of popular sovereignty?
    15·1 answer
  • 1. Which of the following is an act of road rage?
    5·2 answers
  • In what important way are the supreme court justices different than other government officials?
    5·1 answer
  • What should be the punishment of those who eat pizza with pineaplle
    8·2 answers
  • What would the most difficult part of being a peace officer would be?
    13·1 answer
  • What can you be charged with if you refuse to provide identifying information to an officer
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!