1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AveGali [126]
3 years ago
13

If you were a member of the Supreme Court what law would you rule as unconstitutional? What basis would you use to support your

decision?
Law
1 answer:
Vsevolod [243]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The def: not in accordance with a political constitution, especially the US Constitution, or with procedural rules. Ex." we cannot tolerate unconstitutional action" Declaring laws constitutional or un unconstitutional is done by the deciding in the Judicial Branch of government.

However, governments do not just create laws. Governments also enforce the laws set forth in the document defining the government—in the Constitution. In the United States, the failure to seat duly elected representatives of the people following a proper election, or the failure to provide for such elections would be unconstitutional even in the absence of any legislated laws whatsoever.

When the proper court determines that a legislative act (a law) conflicts with the constitution, it finds that law unconstitutional and declares it void in whole or in part. This is called judicial review. The portion of the law declared void is considered struck down, or the entire statute is considered struck from the statute books.

Depending on the type of legal system, a statute may be declared unconstitutional by any court, or only by special Constitutional courts with authority to rule on the validity of a statute. In some countries, the legislature may create any law for any purpose, and there is no provision for courts to declare a law unconstitutional. This can occur either because the country has no codified constitution that laws must conform to (e.g., the United Kingdom and New Zealand) or because the constitution is codified but no court has the authority to strike down laws on the basis of it (e.g., the Netherlands and Switzerland).

You might be interested in
An employee is entitled by law to reasonably safe working conditions.<br> True<br> O False
VMariaS [17]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

nobody would put another person at risk

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Cou
Burka [1]

Answer:

The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.

Explanation:

The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers.  This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions.  The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage.  With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.

3 0
3 years ago
H
levacccp [35]

Answer:

I am not understanding your question

8 0
3 years ago
One advantage of a shotgun over a handgun is the shotgun:
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

A shotgun (also known as a scattergun,[1] or historically as a fowling piece) is a long-barreled firearm designed to shoot a straight-walled cartridge known as a shotshell, which usually discharges numerous small pellet-like spherical sub-projectiles called shot, or sometimes a single solid projectile called a slug. Shotguns are most commonly smoothbore firearms, meaning that their gun barrels have no rifling on the inner wall, but rifled barrels for shooting slugs (slug barrels) are also available.

Shotguns come in a wide variety of calibers and gauges ranging from 5.5 mm (.22 inch) to up to 5 cm (2.0 in), though the 12-gauge (18.53 mm or 0.729 in) and 20-gauge (15.63 mm or 0.615 in) bores are by far the most common. Almost all are breechloading, and can be single-barreled, double-barreled, or in the form of a combination gun. Like rifles, shotguns also come in a range of different action types, both single-shot and repeating. For non-repeating designs, over-and-under and side-by-side break action shotguns are by far the most common variants. Although revolving shotguns did exist, most modern repeating shotguns are either pump-action or semi-automatic, and also fully automatic, lever-action or bolt-action to a lesser extent.

However, A handgun is a short-barrelled firearm that can be held and used with one hand.[1] The two most common handgun sub-types in use today are revolvers and semi-automatic pistols, although other handgun-types such as derringers and machine pistols also see infrequent usage.

In the days before commercial mass production, handguns were often considered a badge of office, much the same as a ceremonial sword. As they had limited utility and were more expensive than the long guns of the era, handguns were carried only by the very few who could afford to purchase them. However, in 1836, Samuel Colt patented the Colt Paterson, the first practical mass-produced revolver. It was capable of firing 5 shots in rapid succession and very quickly became a popular defensive weapon, giving rise to the saying, "God created men, but Colt made them equal."[2][3] Today, in most of the world, handguns are generally used primarily by police and military officers as sidearms. However, in the United States and some other countries around the world, handguns are also widely available to civilians and commonly carried for self-defense.

3 0
2 years ago
Do you think all criminal cases should be heard by professionals and paid judges instead? Would this be better? Why?
KIM [24]

\large{\underline{\underline{\pmb{\sf{\color{yellow}{Answer:}}}}}}

<u>No</u><u> </u><u>criminal</u><u> </u><u>crime</u><u> </u><u>should</u><u> </u><u>not</u><u> </u><u>be</u><u> </u><u>heard</u><u> </u><u>judges</u><u> </u><u>other</u><u> </u><u>than</u><u> </u><u>professional</u><u> </u><u>and</u><u> </u><u>paid</u><u> </u><u>judges</u><u> </u><u>because</u><u> </u><u>they</u><u> </u><u>have</u><u> </u><u>a</u><u> </u><u>lot</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>experience</u><u> </u><u>about</u><u> </u><u>these</u><u> </u><u>kinds</u><u> </u><u>of</u><u> </u><u>cases</u>

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Question 1. Who are the two major parties in the U.K. ?
    13·1 answer
  • All of the following statements are true with regard to qualifying business losses EXCEPT:The loss will reduce any other current
    11·1 answer
  • Swimmers at a local fishing hole discover a body on the riverbank. Upon examination of the body, Medical Examiner Martinez deter
    5·2 answers
  • What kind of information would best help you answer the prompt? Check all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT included in a final sketch as stated in the
    7·2 answers
  • What is a possible consequence for failing to investigate a report of unprofessional conduct by a school employee?
    8·1 answer
  • Which is the right answer?
    8·1 answer
  • Yall please help me!!I need to turn this is asap like very soon​
    10·1 answer
  • On April 16, 1982, at 10 pm Ray Johnson and his eight-year-old son David were waiting for a "walk" signal before crossing a stre
    7·2 answers
  • Which article of the constitution establishes the judicial branch.
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!