Answer:
Hsu was indicted for violating the Economic Espio- nage Act by conspiring to steal corporate trade secrets for an anti-cancer drug. The defense requested a copy of the trade secret documents. The government contended that the defense did not need access to the documents except under supervision of the judge. The defense maintained a right of full access to the documents so the defense of impossibil- ity could be established, meaning Hsu could not steal trade secrets that did not exist. District court agreed with the defense; government appealed. Must the defendant be allowed full access to trade secrets that are a key part of a case? [U.S. v. Hsu, 155 F. 3d 189, 3rd Cir. (1998)]
Explanation:
I think d but I may be wrong I have a strong feeling it is not c
Answer:
$44 billion.
Explanation:
Alcohol-impaired-driving crashes are automobile crashes caused as a result of a driver driving under the influence of alcohol, especially when he exceeds the daily allowed average, BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration), which is 0.8g/deciliter.
This implies that it is illegal and a punishable offense for a driver of any kind of motor vehicle to continue driving when his blood alcohol concentration is above the allowed limit.
Answer:
The ruling was made by a lower court than the court hearing the current case.
Some of the facts of the original case are significantly different than the current case.
The judge in the original case did not have jurisdiction to try the case.
Explanation:
1, 5,4
