Answer:
the answer is C?
Explanation:
it is the only one that sounds right.
Answer:
With the rise of technology and the internet, people are able to communciate from across the world. People can build relationships through the internet and share ideas and opinnions. Not only are we able to connect with other people, but through these forms of communciation, we can also share news on politics across the globe or our poltical plans and ideas. Poltical parties and candidates are able to use social media platforms to reach more audiences who may not always tune into their local news stations on the T.V. or the radio. They can reach out to newer generations who are constantly communicating through the internet.
Before when news used to spread through the newspaper where it would take a lot of hard work to print out the news, with the rise in the telegraph, reporters could go across the nation chasing stories to report back to their headquarters before they even got home. Then the radio and the television rose and we had an even better way to share news and overtime it became easier and easier to reach out to the public to communicate with them in a timely manner.
Answer:
option a is the true statement
When scholars and justices interpret the Constitution with the view that the courts should reject any active lawmaking functions and follow precedent, refers to Judicial Restraint.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The judicial branch is conferred with the power of interpretation of the law. Many times while exercising the power of judicial activism there is always a chance that justices may exceed their power. Hence, the theory of judicial restraint was evolved.
By judicial restraint, judges are encouraged to exercise their power with certain limits and to respect and follow stare decisis. This ensures that judges are not intruding into the realm of the legislature by involving themselves in law making.
Answer:
Yes it is lawful.
Explanation:
A sentence of probation is actually an alternative of a jail sentence. The Courts have found that probationers have reduced expectations of privacy so they don't have the same Fourth Amendment rights as others. Courts can require probationers to submit to warrantless searches not supported by probable cause. The goal is only to help rehabilitate the probationer, protect society, or both.
Although officers usually need warrants or probable cause before they can search a person or home, a search condition eliminates this requirement. In some states, an officer must have reasonable suspicion before conducting a probation search, but in others, an officer can conduct searches at any time, even without reason to believe that the probationer committed a crime. Some of these search conditions allow only probation officers to search, while others authorize both probation and police officers to do the same
The Fourth Amendment typically prevents police from searching someone’s body, belongings, or home without a warrant or probable cause. But judges gives a condition of sentencing someone to probation, that the probationer agree to warrantless searches. Since this condition does not entitled the probationer’s normal Fourth Amendment rights, it’s sometimes called a “Fourth waiver.”
