Answer:
Impossible to say <u>(READ THE EXPLANATION)</u>
Explanation:
It is incredibly hard to say what would’ve/wouldn’t have happened for events that have passed. I imagine that they still would’ve lost (US would’ve caught up and far exceeded eventually). The Battle of the Atlantic would have been different. Although the British did develop radar first, the Germans used it far better and far more often than the Allies did. Actually, the Germans used a more advanced radar system that the allies didn‘t come up woth till perhaps the end of the war. The long and short of it is the same would’ve happens because the Germans used it better and more often than the Allies until about 1944.
Answer:
What do you want to know?
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is 1. incomplete comparison.
Explanation:
In the example, there can certainly exist a logical relation between the two propositions (inquisitive students - make - better students), however, since there is not enough information, a logical relation between them cannot be properly constructed. If the comparison presented some sort of argument then it would be complete. For instance: "Inquisitive children, <em>since they are more curious and open to learning</em>, make better students". Without the argument, the idea seems more like an unsustained opinion, based on prejudice, than anything else.
Answer:
I do not think they should be the villains. Thye just wanted to be the rulers of ther home. After all the garden was theres before it was a garden. Yes they are the antagonists but it is there home. It is not fair that snakes get such bad reps just because thy are snakes.
Explanation:
