Answer:
The reason for migration can be attributed to segregation and better life.
Explanation:
Northern and Eastern migration: It was the relocation to cities of the West, Midwest and North due to unpleasant segregation laws and unsatisfactory economic opportunities which resulted in the movement of blacks to head north, where industrial workers were needed.
Bantu Migration: The reasons for the Bantu migrations were:
• Dried state of the Sahara grasslands which resulted into people that practiced agriculture to move in search of water and fertile land for farming.
• Increase in population which created pressure on resources causing movement in search for new land.
• Tribal wars resulted in defeated tribes to relocate for safety.
• Expansion of their iron-working after its discovery also caused migration.
The effects of Bantu migration include positive and negative effects. Positive effects include:
• Introduction of iron working
• Increase in food production.
• Introduction of new crops such as bananas and yams.
Negative effects include:
• Depopulation which was due to constant attacks for land by the Bantu against people in East Africa.
• Loss of culture: The loss of culture was a result of cultural absorption and intermarriage with other tribes.
The main advantage that the South had at the beginning of the war was its large army and well-trained generals. The Confederacy, from this perspective, appeared more capable of winning the war at the beginning of the conflict. Moreover, as most of the fighting was carried out in the South, they also had the advantage of knowing the territory.
I do not think that the South failed to exploit its initial advantages. The Confederacy fought extremely well during the early stages of the war. However, the North's advantages were finally just greater. The South relied on agriculture, which was rendered unviable during the war. Moreover, it had a much smaller population, and its workforce was destroyed after emancipation. All of these put the Confederacy in a particularly difficult position.
<u><em>European colonialism and colonization were known as the practice of acquiring full or partial political control over the societies and territories through the creation of a colony, occupying it with settlers and utilizing it economically. </em></u>
<u><em>The reason why the European could colonize the no- european regions were basically because they didn’t have an advanced military equipment and there wasn’t a leader that could keep united the various groups. Finally they were debilitated by trade restrictions and embargo.</em></u>
World War 1 ended following a number of won fronts and battles after which numerous governments ended while some countries ceased to exist. Austro Hungary agreed to an armistice while some countries were completely run over. The consequences were severe. Austro-Hungary and the Ottoman Empire ceased to exist, while Germany had to accept numerous conditions such as giving territory, losing their army and weaponry, and numerous other things that left them highly dissatisfied, which only led to the rise of the Nazi party.
<span>The major difference between these two systems is that in a Presidential system, the executive leader, the President, is directly voted upon by the people. I hope it helps.</span><span>
</span>
