Answer:
Few advancements in scientific knowledge were made. Scientists discovered new evidence to support their theories. Scientists discovered that old interpretations of data was incorrect. Scientists used observations and mathematical data to solve problems in new ways.
Explanation:
Okay, here’s what I found
Both excerpts are examples of science fiction, and they both describe machines that attack humans. However, the Campbell excerpt is an example of hard sci-fi because the style and narration places emphasis on the functionality and complexity of a certain technology—in this case, a rocket ship. The “Richard” excerpt is an example of social sci-fi since the purpose of the futuristic technology is not simply in its function, but more in its effect on humanity. In the Campbell excerpt, the push of a button brings a machine to life. The function and the structure of the machine is given emphasis. In the “Richard” excerpt, the effect the machines have on people is given emphasis. One of the survivors even speaks about the machine as if it were a person.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because nobody is being called by "you" or "I"
Indeed cities should be required to have detailed evacuation plans
> We cannot provide specific textual evidence because you forgot to attach the passage. However, we can comment on the following.
> Every city should have a very thought-out plan to evacuate the citizens in case of a natural disaster.
> In the absence of this plan, citizens are at the mercy of luck, and that is no good.
> Every local and state government should foster the culture of prevention instead of only reacting when the problem has arisen.
> Natural disasters did not warn you. They hit a city and if people are not prepared to act, what follows is panic and chaos.
We can conclude that every city should create the proper evacuation plan and have simulacrums or rehearsals so people could know how to act in order to prevent tragedies.
Learn more about this topic here:
brainly.com/question/10063889?referrer=searchResults
