Answer:
d. Eliminate contributions to inefficient non-profit organizations
Explanation:
Other listed options are valuable to the question on strategic philanthropy except that on the need to eliminate contributions to inefficient non-profit organizations. No philanthropist would want to offer support to non-profit organizations that are unproductive and inefficient.
Resembled to more developed countries, slight developed countries have a higher ratio of workers in the condition of goods and services the tertiary sector most individuals must produce food for their survival sector of the economizing.
<h3>What is the difference between a more developed country and a less developed country?</h3>
A developed country is a government that has a high level of automation and per capita income while a developing country is a country that is still in the early phases of industrial development and has a low per capita revenue.
To learn more about developing countries visit the link
brainly.com/question/14927048
#SPJ4
Answer:
'Retained income'.
Explanation:
We have been given that Crawford Fishing had a net income of $35,640 in 2017. They decided to pay $3,000 in dividends and keep the rest to help expand their production line.
We know that the net income that remains after paying dividends is known as 'Retained income'.
We also know that retained income can be used to pay off debts or it can be invested into business activities.
Therefore, the profit that Crawford Fishing keep to reinvest in the business is recorded as retained income.
Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
If the restrictions on working hours are removed such that keeping other factors constant, the total number of hours worked increases. This will cause the total output to increase.
But the workers will not be able to work efficiently for longer hours. This will cause productivity to decline.
This happens because working for long hours will make the workers tired. Their health is negatively impacted so their productivity will decline.