Answer:
Total= $25,891
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
One year ago, the Jenkins Family Fun Center deposited $4,500 into an investment account for the purpose of buying new equipment four years from today. Today, they are adding another $6,300 to this account. They plan on making a final deposit of $8,500 to the account next year.
We need to use the following formula:
FV= PV/(1+i)^n
FV= 4,500*(1.08)^5=6,612
FV= 6,300*(1.08)^4= 8,571
FV= 8,500*(1.08)^3= 10,708
Total= $25,891
During pre-planning, planning is being taken place during this stage in which the planning or brain storming is being done in advance in a form of having to organize the things that a team should do to finish task ahead of time or just right in time.
Answer:
<h2>In the case of the salt,the salt buyers would bear most of the tax burden and for caviar,the sellers would bear most of the tax burden.Hence,the correct answer is option b. or buyers of salt and the sellers of caviar.</h2><h2 />
Explanation:
In the case of salt,the supply is more elastic than the demand which implies that the salt sellers are relatively more responsive to salt price change in the market.Therefore,if any tax is imposed on them,it would basically translate into higher production cost for the sellers and due to price elasticity of supply,the sellers would pass the tax to the salt consumers who are comparatively less price sensitive.Now,since the consumer demand for salt is inelastic and the consumers are relatively price insensitive,the consumers won't perhaps mind paying a higher market price for salt including the extra tax.Hence,in this instance,the tax burden would fall on the salt buyers or consumers.
On the other hand,based on the same line of argument,the tax burden would fall on the sellers of caviars as the price elasticity of caviar supply is less than that of the caviar demand.In this case,the caviar sellers are less sensitive about changes in market price of caviars and thus,won't mind paying a relatively higher production cost/expense which is inclusive of the tax burden.Due to higher price elasticity of demand or price responsiveness,the cavier consumers would be reluctant to bear the tax burden and pass it onto the sellers.
Answer:
$8.31 million and No.
Explanation:
In this question, we have to find out the present value which is shown below:
= $1 + first year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) + second year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) ^ number of years + third year value ÷ ( 1 + discount rate) ^ number of years
= $1 + $2 million ÷ (1 + 10%) + ($3 million ÷ 1.10)^2 + ($4 million ÷ 1.10)^3
= $1 million + $1.82 million + $2.48 million + $3.01 million
= $8.31 million
No the package would not worth $10 million as its present value is $8.31 million
