The argument is <em>that children go to school to learn not to teach their elders ,</em> where teachers can be included. Public schools are subsidised with taxes. Bearing this in mind, we may say that taxpayers send their children to school for them to learn not to teach. This was what the taxpayers did when <em>they themselves </em>were students . Therefore, t<em>axpayers send their children to school on the premise that, at their age, they needed to learn, not teach </em>is the reasoning of the argument.
i believe the answer is the writer. i went to school for this so im pretty sure.
There is certainly a rhythm to Grendel's warlike appearance here. He is personified as the devil or devil-like. The author uses alliteration to add impact to a galloping like pace in which Grendel advances (ex. bogs- bearing / trap-trip / God -Grendel).
The purpose of the author to include the sentence is "to condemn the insincerity of his critics’ advice."
<h3 /><h3>What is a purpose?</h3>
A purpose can be defined as the intention of the writer behind something. It may be for a sentence, a word, or a phrase.
The sentence "Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will" explains that a little understanding from the good will persons is more frustrating than being misunderstood from the ill will ones.
He included this sentence to critisize or condemn the insincerity of his critics’ advice. He feels that the critics pay less attention to the whole text and then give shallow advices.
Therefore the correct option is A.
Learn more about purpose here:
brainly.com/question/1450271
