1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Naily [24]
3 years ago
13

What is an important difference between interest groups and political parties?

History
2 answers:
AURORKA [14]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

D

Explanation: cmon man I’m in middle school you should know this

dybincka [34]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Interest groups are like people that are supporting green energy and lobbying it to the government (they focus on that one issue). The political groups are the Republican and Democrats.

You might be interested in
50 POINTS!!!How does the judicial branch of Georgia fulfill its duty to interpret the laws of the state?
zalisa [80]
The answer would be a. Hope this helps!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write a journal entry as if you were a traveler from the 1800s in America. Include how and why you were traveling as well as the
olya-2409 [2.1K]

Answer:

please pleaseeeeeee tell me!

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was a common goal of Spanish and British explorers in the Southeastern region of North America?
galina1969 [7]

Answer - B. To discover gold.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
explain how the Wilmot Proviso was so controversial in raising the debate over the slave issue again to such intense levels.
Pachacha [2.7K]

The Whigs faced a different scenario. The victory of James K. Polk (Democrat) over Henry Clay (Whig) in the 1844 presidential election had caught the southern Whigs by surprise. The key element of this defeat, which carried over into the congressional and local races in 1845 and 1846 throughout the South, was the party's failure to take a strong stand favoring Texas annexation. Southern Whigs were reluctant to repeat their mistakes on Texas, but, at the same time, Whigs from both sections realized that victory and territorial acquisition would again bring out the issue of slavery and the territories. In the South in particular, there was already the realization, or perhaps fear, that the old economic issues that had defined the Second Party System<span> were already dead. Their political goal was to avoid any sectional debate over slavery which would expose the sectional divisions within the party.</span>After an earlier attempt to acquire Texas by treaty had failed to receive the necessary two-thirds approval of the Senate, the United States annexed the Republic of Texas by a joint resolution of Congress that required simply a majority vote in each house of Congress. President John Tyler signed the bill on March 1, 1845, a few days before his term ended. As many expected, the annexation led to war with Mexico. After the capture of New Mexico and California in the first phases of the war, the political focus shifted to how much territory would be acquired from Mexico. The key to this was the determination of the future status of slavery in any new territory.

Both major political parties had labored long to keep divisive slavery issues out of national politics. The Democrats had generally been successful in portraying those within their party attempting to push a purely sectional issue as extremists that were well outside the normal scope of traditional politics.[2] However, midway through Polk's term, Democratic dissatisfaction with the administration was growing within the Martin Van Buren, or Barnburner, wing of the Democratic Party over other issues. Many felt that Van Buren had been unfairly denied the party's nomination in 1844 when southern delegates resurrected a convention rule, last used in 1832, requiring that the nominee had to receive two-thirds of the delegate votes. Many in the North were also upset with the Walker tariff which reduced the tariff rates; others were opposed to Polk's veto of a popular river and harbor improvements bill, and still others were upset over the Oregon settlement with Great Britain where it appeared that Polk did not pursue the northern territory with the same vigor he used to acquire Texas. Polk was seen more and more as enforcing strict party loyalty primarily to serve southern interests. Hope This Helps! Can I have Brainliest? Please:)

7 0
3 years ago
What three things happened after Tariff of 1828 was past
Sergeeva-Olga [200]
Andrew Jackson became president

he made his Kitchen Cabinet

Calhoun became a big senator leader in the south.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The innovation of using conveyor belts on an assembly line is attributed to
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a federalist philosophy
    12·2 answers
  • Natural born law of blood
    11·1 answer
  • Why did secretary of state Thomas Jefferson criticize U.S policy towards france
    5·2 answers
  • Were groups that advocated the use of violence in the 1960s justified in doing so? Why or why not?
    15·1 answer
  • The Balfour declaration of 1917 supported the idea of a
    8·1 answer
  • What does “Mesopotamia” mean?
    8·2 answers
  • The english finally became successful in defeating the french in the seven years' war under the leadership of: question 2 option
    11·1 answer
  • Name at least two reasons why the people France revoited against their<br> government."
    10·1 answer
  • Who was William Westmoreland?
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!