I think that it is "It reinforces the idea that without equality in the US, the idea of a free society is a joke."
Answer and Explanation:
Thoreau claimed that it was fair to promote civil disobedience when the government promoted malefic laws that promoted the return of humanity. This concept was also defended by Martin Luther King, Malala, among other great thinkers who fight against unjust and harmful laws. We can confirm that the rejection of these types of laws and disobedience are essential to prevent those laws from continuing in a region. In this case, civil disobedience as a form of resistance to the denial of rights must be defended, but it must be defended, a time that the laws must attend to the will of the people.
Answer:
What are you talking about
Explanation:
Character, as if the two were gladiators, waging war on the sands of the Coliseum in some winner-take-all death battle. Both sides of the debate claim a definitive superiority for their chosen gladiator, and for the most part, the battle splits nicely down the lines of literary and commercial fiction, the commercialists placing the emphasis on plot in the interest of producing “page turners,” while the literati poke up their noses at the thought of anything so crude and artless.
Answer/Explanation:
Visual (sight) because of the descriptive comparison of the outlines, you can almost see what they look like. It is like the author hands you a photo of the words in action.