A group with similar beliefs about government best describes a political party.
<u>Option: D</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
This is an collective community of citizens who share similar political values, and participate in contesting elections to retain government power. They compromise on some of the suggested policies and initiatives, aiming to encourage the common good or nurture their supporters' interests.
It is also necessary to note that while political parties are generally known for their ideology and way of operating, major differences still exist. Many political parties have an common heart, although some do not, and others embody philosophies that are somewhat different when the party was formed from those of previous.
The correct answer is option B) Inhalants
Inhalants are a category of drugs that does not increase your risk of contracting HIV through infecting needles.
However, the use of other categories such as stimulants and narcotics can have a considerably higher chance of contracting HIV.
The HIV virus is not a contagious virus like flue. Instead, it needs physical contact to actually spread.
This does not mean simple touching of hands but more consistent practices such as sexual intercourse or the contact of an infected blood with another person.
Someone who injects drugs such as cocaine and heroine and shares needles with other drug addicts can have a much higher chance of contracting HIV.
Option D, It dominated the Aegean world through warfare, is the right answer.
This Mycenaean civilization was a Bronze Age civilization, which flourished in Greece, around 1600- 1100 BCE. Until they conquered Crete, they lived under the dominance of the people of the Minoan civilization. In or around the year 1600 BCE, a volcanic eruption took place on the land near Crete, which devastated the Minoan civilization. This situation led the Mycenaean to oust the Minoans and succeed them as the authoritative culture on the land.
Answer:
The Supreme Court decision that decided the 2000 Presidential Election should go down in history as one of the court's most ill-conceived judgments. In issuing its poorly-reasoned ruling in Bush v. Gore, the court majority unnecessarily exposed itself to charges of partisanship and risked undermining the court's stature as an independent, impartial arbiter of the law. Although the court majority correctly identified constitutional problems in the specific recount proceedings ordered by the Florida Supreme Court, the decision to end all recount attempts did immeasurable damage to the equal protection rights the court claimed to be guarding, since it favored a convenient and timely tabulation of ballots over an accurate recording of the vote. In the controversy that followed this decision, some critics of the majority decision argued that the court had no business taking on Bush v. Gore in the first place, that it should have remained solely within the Florida courts (Ginsburg, J. [Dissent] Bush v. Gore [2000]). This paper will argue that the court was correct to intervene but that umm the resulting decision was flawed and inconsistent, with potentially serious, adverse implications for the Federal judiciary if the court continues to issue rulings in this way.
Explanation:
