<span>more time than you think you will need because you need to first think and than write. You should always spend more time thinking. </span>
Answer:
He was highly skilled at begging, he was so good with his words that he could get even the poorest person to give something. He was able to get a lot, for a small amount of work. The Friar would take money to absolve people; the more money he got, the better the absolution. his brethren did no poaching where he went."
Explanation:
please mark as brainliest if I helped you
Answer:
C.
Explanation:
"The Selective Laziness Of Human Reasoning" is an article written by Tania Lombrozo. The aticle talks about how people tend to focus on the flaws of others argument than evaluating their own arguments. To prove this thesis, a research was conducted by the researchers in which the choice blindness concept was adopted. The choices that were made by the participants were swaped and mostly people failed to recognize the swap and presented their argument over the choice that they did not make previously.
<u>The correct option to support the claim of the main idea of the text is C. When the choices made by participants were swapped and not recognized by them, they produced the argument over the choice that they did not make and were critical about the arguments they produced when they were coming from others</u>.
So, the correct answer is option C.
restraining oneself from indulging in something
Answer:
To study the processes by which past behaviour influences future behaviour, participants were led to believe that without being aware of it, they had expressed either support for or opposition to the institution of comprehensive exams. Judgment and response time data suggested that participants’ perceptions of their past behaviour often influenced their decisions to repeat the behaviour. This influence was partly the result of cognitive activity that influenced participants’ cognitions about specific behavioural consequences and the attitude they based on these cognitions. More generally, however, feedback about past behaviour had a direct effect on participants’ attitudes and ultimate behavioural decisions that were independent of the outcome-specific cognitions. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for biased scanning of memory, dissonance reduction, self-perception, and the use of behaviour as a heuristic.
