Is this correct????????
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Answer for part A is 
which in English means "angle A is congruent to angle D"
The reason why we know that angle A and angle D are congruent is because they are both right angles. By the right angle congruence theorem (the reason just below the blank for part A), we can say that angle A = angle D. They are both 90 degree angles.
------------------------------------------------
Answer for the blank in part B is "Given" without quotation marks of course. This is the first "given" while the second given is coming up in part C
------------------------------------------------
For part C, the other given is
so that's what will go in the blank. It may seem silly, but all we're doing is repeating verbatim what is given to us. With any proof, you always start with what you are given and somehow connect it with what you're trying to prove
------------------------------------------------
Finally, the answer for the blank in part D is "AAS Congruence Theorem" (without quotes)
The AAS congruence theorem allows us to prove two triangles congruent if we know if two pairs of angles are congruent plus if we know two sides are congruent as well.
The angle portions are covered by part A and part C. The side portions are part B's territory. Combining A, B, & C allows us to use the AAS theorem
Note: It is NOT the ASA theorem because the two angles do not sandwich the sides. In other words, the side AB is not between the two angles A and C. Similarly, DE is not between the two angles D and F. The order is very important as ASA is slightly different than AAS.
The reason why we know that angle A and angle D are congruent is because they are both right angles. By the right angle congruence theorem (the reason just below the blank for part A), we can say that angle A = angle D. They are both 90 degree angles.
------------------------------------------------
Answer for the blank in part B is "Given" without quotation marks of course. This is the first "given" while the second given is coming up in part C
------------------------------------------------
For part C, the other given is
------------------------------------------------
Finally, the answer for the blank in part D is "AAS Congruence Theorem" (without quotes)
The AAS congruence theorem allows us to prove two triangles congruent if we know if two pairs of angles are congruent plus if we know two sides are congruent as well.
The angle portions are covered by part A and part C. The side portions are part B's territory. Combining A, B, & C allows us to use the AAS theorem
Note: It is NOT the ASA theorem because the two angles do not sandwich the sides. In other words, the side AB is not between the two angles A and C. Similarly, DE is not between the two angles D and F. The order is very important as ASA is slightly different than AAS.
a) Net result of Tamiko's transactions = $143.75
b) Total amount she can save = $86.25
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1 :
Given,
Amount Tamiko got in her first check = $109.60
Amount of the bonus check = $34.15
Fraction of the amount she wants to save =
We need to find the net results of her transactions and the amount she will save
Step 2 :
The new result of her transactions can be computed by adding the amount she has received through both the check.
Total amount she received = 109.60 + 34.15 = 143.75
Total amount she can save = × 143.75 = 86.25
Step 3 :
Answer :
a) Net result of Tamiko's transactions = $143.75
b) Total amount she can save = $86.25