Yur answers r A,B AND D hope it helps
Answer:
That dude is unreal
Explanation:
idk what is wrong with him
If you are referring to the United States, the answer is probably the Vietnam War.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, this question is incomplete because does not include the policies it is referring to. However, we can comment on the following.
Indeed, there have to be policies aimed to control the growth of the population. Otherwise, the federal government could not keep track of the natalities on a monthly and yearly basis. This control is needed because the government has to be aware of the impact of the number of newborns on public services.
However, all the controls instilled by the government have to be reasonable and respect the human rights of the parents. Nothing has to be imposed that does not respect their rights.
The government expects that parents can be responsible enough to bring the number of children they can take care of. To not compromise the health service industry and the public education system, and other public services.
Both sophists and philosophers were well trained and highly educated, but the main difference was that a sophist taught others and they got paid for that. It is said that their own wealth was their only goal.
Philosophers, such as Socrates, refused to get paid.
Throughout history, the sophists have had a reputation as professionally amoral, . They would help people to attain any goal, regardless of what it was. They would take any case, promote any cause, and empower any person, if the money was right.
Philosophers, for the most part, have walked on the side of the angels. They may sometimes have had reputations as prolix and obscure, complex and abstract, out of touch, but they have, for the most part, seemed to be purer souls in their focus and work.
In other words, the sophists were much more concerned about how than about why. The philosophers have always been more cautious.
