1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ivan
3 years ago
15

People work:

History
2 answers:
Sergeu [11.5K]3 years ago
5 0
Yep they are correct
Vikentia [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

all of these are correct

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In what way were the Maya different from the Aztec and Inca civilizations?
seraphim [82]
A. The Aztec and Inca had large, united empires, but the Maya did not. <span>The Mayan region was divided into several independent city-states, some of which became powerful. A king ruled each city-state and served as the head of the government, military, and religion. Each king had a court of followers and was advised by a council. To avoid war, kings often acted as diplomats as they formed alliances with other city-states. However, diplomacy often failed and, as a result, war between city-states was common. The city-state structure of the Maya prevented them from uniting into an empire.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the camps called the US were putting Japanese people in out in the west?
ANTONII [103]
The internment of Japanese Americans in the United States during World War II was the forced relocation and incarceration in concentration camps in the western interior of the country of about 120,000[5] people of Japanese ancestry, most of whom lived on the Pacific Coast. Sixty-two percent of the internees were (answer= A.)
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A climate of fear and paranoia over slavery developed in the South. What were the events and arguments that caused this and enha
densk [106]

Answer:

The issue of slavery gradually shook the foundations of the two-party system of the Whigs Democrats. Its noticeable aggravation occurred as a result of the adoption in May 1854 of a bill on the incorporation into the United States of the territories of Kansas and Nebraska, located north of 36°30, the border of slavery, established by the Missouri compromise of 1820. The initiator of the bill was the Democratic Party. It was based on the doctrine of "sovereignty of the settlers", according to which the status of slavery in the new states was to be determined by the population.

The doctrine of the "sovereignty of the settlers" that appeared in the political arsenal of the democrats in the late 40s,  is difficult to be give an unambiguous assessment. Putting it forward, the leadership of the Democratic Party was looking for ways to ensure internal political stability and achieve a new compromise between the North and the South. On the other hand, the initiators of the bill assured the population of the North that the flow of settler farmers would undoubtedly exceed the influx of slave owners into new territories, which guarantees the future accession of these territories to the Union as free states. However, the Democratic leadership’s calculations for attenuation of disputes about slavery did not implement.

The center of gravity for all opponents of slavery was the new Republican Party. The Republicans entered the political arena with a program of radical reconstruction of the country's socio-economic structure through territorial restrictions on the institution of slavery. During these years, many moderately opposed opponents of the spread of slavery in Western territories feared the radicalism of the Republican Party.

Moderate positions on the issue of slavery determined the election of Lincoln as a compromise Republican presidential candidate in the 1860 election. Lincoln, thanks in large part to the split in the Democratic Party, which nominated two candidates, managed to get ahead of his rivals in the elections and become president of the United States. The first Republican president won the election, mainly due to support from the North.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
How was this "Red Scare" similar to the one in the 1920s?​
madam [21]

Answer:

Explanation: During both periods, Congress passed laws restricting the civil liberties of American citizens that met with overall public support” is the one statement that explains how the Red Scare of the 1920s and the Red Scare of the 1950s were similar.

7 0
2 years ago
Why did the dutch activities of bowling ice-skating and sledding represent
Neko [114]
The Dutch wanted to connect to their origins
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which best describes the beliefs of early Hebrews?
    14·2 answers
  • Animals gathered around flooding river plains true or false
    15·1 answer
  • How did mesopotamian and Egyptian city-states develop concepts of law codes and divine kingship
    12·1 answer
  • How were the ideas of the Puritans different from those of the Separatists?
    5·1 answer
  • The revolution in ____ is one of the many events that helped to make for uncertain times at the start of the First Red Scare.
    6·2 answers
  • Four events dealing with some early events in world history are listed below. Which is the correct chronological order of these
    8·1 answer
  • How did Tecumseh hope to stop white settlers from taking Native American land?
    7·1 answer
  • Which country sent warships to take over New Netherland in 1664?
    9·2 answers
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP! PLEASE HELP ME :)
    13·1 answer
  • 1. define economic policy without using the word economic. provide 1 example of and economic policy.
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!