Thi question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.
The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Marriage Act held no legitimate state interest and thus overturned it.
Answer: intermediate scrutiny
Explanation:
In United States v. Windsor, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed the lower court's decision that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional.
The court found that, since homosexuals had been historically subjected to discrimination, they could be considered as a group that falls under a "quasi-suspect classification", and therefore intermediate scrutiny could be applied.
DOMA was deemed unconstitutional under the equal protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment because it didn´t pass that test.
He is considered important today for his laws. He came up with the saying “An eye for an eye”. He set himself apart from the other kings by setting a large list of laws that caused mixed reactions. For example, one of his laws were “If a man knocks the eye out of a free man, his eye shall be knocked out too.” Some viewed his laws as cruel while others viewed them as fair.
In the late 1940s, the United States responded to the growing threat presented by the Soviet Union by trying to stem the tide of Communism by supporting and propping up governments that opposed Communism.
D. the military ........... the only one that makes sense