1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
andrew-mc [135]
3 years ago
7

Which best explains why immigration laws were passed in the 1920's?

History
1 answer:
Makovka662 [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Option B, Many nativist groups opposed continued immigration, is the right answer.

Explanation:

In the decade of 1920's, the restrictions on immigration increased. The government of the United States enacted the Immigration Act in the year 1924 to put restrictions on immigration. This act was the most severe of all the acts made to control immigration because it limited the overall number of immigrants and introduced quotas based on the nationality of immigrants.

The introduction of this act resulted in a sharp reduction in the number of immigrants coming from Eastern Europe and Africa and it completely restricted the immigration of Asians except for Japan and the Philippines. The government of the United States passed these immigration laws because many native groups opposed the continued migration in America.

You might be interested in
How did life change for middle class women in the 1890s?
Paraphin [41]
Because women wanted to be equal to men
8 0
3 years ago
Witch of the fowling is true of native american alliances during the french and indian war brainly
gogolik [260]

Answer: Which of the following is true of Native American alliances during the French and Indian War? Tribes only allied with the British. Tribes only allied with the French. Trib…

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Which is a shared responsibility between state governments and federal government
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

Explanation: Federalism is a system which is based on democratic practices and traditions. Accordingly, in this system, the power to rule is distributed between national and state assembly. ... Making and enforcing laws is a shared duty between state governments in the federal government

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What challenges were created because of the Renaissance?
Alexandra [31]

religious reforms, interests in social issues, new forms of lit., artistic achievements, exploration and colonization


The Renaissance is a period in European history, covering the span between the 14th and 17th centuries. It is an extension of the Middle Ages, and is bridged by the Age of Enlightenment to modern history. It grew in fragments, with the very first traces found seemingly in Italy, coming to cover much of Europe, for some scholars marking the beginning of the modern age.


5 0
3 years ago
Wyzanski argues the principle against ex post facto laws is essential for Rule Of Law (otherwise, it merely becomes Rule of Man)
diamong [38]

Answer:

Explanation:

The United States Constitution prohibits legislative bills of attainder. Which is indicated in federal law under Article I, Section 9, and in state law under Article I, Section 10.  Being banned under state law reflects the significance that the framers are connected to this issue.

The clauses that are prohibiting attainder laws serve two purposes within the U.S. Constitution. They strengthened the separation of powers by means of prohibiting the legislature to execute judicial or executive functions, because  the result of any such acts of legislature would take the form of a bill of attainder. Additionally, they incorporate the conceptualization of due process, that was relatively reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed". Moreover, the constitution of every state clearly progibits bills of attainder as well. For instance, the Wisconsin's constitution under Article I, Section 12 states that, “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.” On the contrary, the Texas version under Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws, Impairing Obligation of Contracts states that, "No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made".  It is not clear though whether a contract that calls for heirs to be denied of their estate is permitted under this law.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The temperance movement achieved its goals with the passage of:
    5·2 answers
  • What were some of the problems that faced President Vladimir Putin in Russia?
    12·1 answer
  • The German population viewed the Treaty of Versailles as What?
    5·2 answers
  • 1. How do modern people explain nature?
    14·1 answer
  • Reagan’s landslide victory in 1980 was proof that
    13·2 answers
  • The name given to people who study the classical<br> works and start the Renaissance.
    10·1 answer
  • How did the president’s reconstruction plans differ from those of congress?
    15·1 answer
  • Order of the causes of the civil war
    7·1 answer
  • Read the event from Esperanza Rising.
    13·2 answers
  • The ___________ came about when philosophers and writers applied the scientific idea of reason to answer political questions.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!