1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aleksandrvk [35]
4 years ago
8

Write a paragraph to draw a conclusion about how events in American history affected the number of women in the workforce.

History
1 answer:
brilliants [131]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The evolution of women in the workforce of the United States was characterized by the social, economic, and political conditions of the time.

Explanation:

Factory owners of the 1820's expected more income by hiring women to work because they were deemed manageable and ready to work for less money so they were the ideal candidates. The period of crisis and war such as Civil War, and the two World Wars created greater scope for women's participation in industries because of the lack of men available. However, the second half of the twentieth century witnessed more reforms in their working conditions and pay scale.

You might be interested in
1. Compare the views of Bradstreet and Johnson toward American Indians.
fredd [130]

Answer:

To begin with, Colonel John Bradstreet starts his statement off by calling the American Indians "savages", the "less useful, and "greatest villains". You can infer that Bradstreet does not like or want a relationship with the American Indians at all. In his statement he emphasizes how the Indians are defenseless, and that they are raising jealousy. I can tell that Bradstreet does not like the encounters with the Indians, nor think they are helpful people. Williams Johnson starts his statement off with saying that the colonist had the wrong idea about the Indians and that they " greatly dispised them" without even knowing their power or knowledge of these lands. He wanted a bond with the Indians that were beneficial; he also believed that the Indians had their own way of living and that they were useful. 

The two perceptions are completely different. Bradstreet has a negative perception of the Indians the whole throughout the whole statement. He believes that the Indians are not a ally, but more of an enemy. Johnson on the other hand believes that the colonist hasn't gave the Indians a chance to show them their knowledge. He also believes that the Indians could be allies, and not enemy's. 

Explanation:

On Edge 2020.

6 0
3 years ago
Which historical interpretation does this source support?
Nastasia [14]

D beacuse they work hard and get rewarded for it!

Hope this helped! :)

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pls help will brainlist​
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer: sorry I can't see it clearly

6 0
2 years ago
"hey now don't try this at home" where is this quote from?
lord [1]

Answer:

fresh

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What was true about feudalism?
ddd [48]
Answer is 1
People were born in social class
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Where was the Muslim empire of khwarazm
    5·2 answers
  • What possessions did the United States gain from the Spanish-America War?
    8·1 answer
  • What was the role of woman in ancient roman society
    8·1 answer
  • Can someone please help
    7·1 answer
  • What is the primary goal of interest groups?
    5·2 answers
  • In your opinion what do you think about the death penalty??
    12·1 answer
  • Types of : Clothing? Food? Houses? in new york colony
    11·2 answers
  • Establece una relación entre reformas y despotismo ilustrado (reformas borbónicas XVIII)
    13·1 answer
  • The Second Opium War (Chinese: 第二次鴉片戰爭), also known as the Second Anglo-Chinese War, the Second China War, the Arrow War, or the
    13·1 answer
  • AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!