A pronoun is a proper noun. Like a name, name of a company or referring to self “I”
Answer:
A. Pres. of "Future Broadcasters of America"
Explanation:
He was an athlete, singer, debater, and class leader, but not a broadcaster.
Queen Elizabeth I was one of the first female rulers in Europe and at the beginning of her reign, conflict and turmoil assailed her kingdom due to the fact that she was, first, a woman, and second, a Protestant among the mostly Catholic rulers of Europe. Even within her realm she suffered a lot of resistance from her subjects also because she was a woman, and mostly, because of her history and the way she ascended the throne. At the very beginning of her reign, Queen Elizabeth addressed Parliament on February 10th, 1559 and focused her efforts on persuading her audience about her strength as a woman and the reasons why she would not choose to marry, which was the issue being pushed forward by her subjects, as it was believed that an unmarried woman could not lead. Queen Elizabeth then uses two arguments to convince her people; the first, that she has been gifted by God and seeks to fulfill His plans and the second, that she is already wedded to England. On her second address, many years later, to her troops at Tilsbury, on August 9, 1558, just before the conflict that was about to arise by the attempted invasion of English soil by the Spanish, Queen Elizabeth once again seeks to persuade her people that marriage is unecessary for her. Once again, she makes mention of her calling by God, therefore not needing to be married, and second, her alliance with England. So the primary purpose for both speeches is the same: Queen Elizabeth seeks to persuade and convince her audience that marriage is not required for her to be a successful ruler.
Hello.
Modernist literature was a predominantly English genre of fiction writing, popular from roughly the 1910s into the 1960s. I think it's subjective to say what makes literature good or bad, because everyone one of us has their own opinion and it's different from other's. However, I do believe that it all depends on what you are grading, what u are looking for... If you like the plot of a book, then it's a good one; if you like the author's style, then he is a good writer; and, if the whole book catched u, then you will love it!
I don't think it's easy to critique a text, because writing it's a very difficult procces, and there are many things that we have to take into account when critiquing a text... opinions can vary according to the one who critiques it.
We have also to know that the way of grading a text changes as long as its genre and time of written does: the world is always envolving and changing, and writing and literature do so.
Hope to give u a light of hope.
That shouldn't be that hard do you understand what cause and effect is? <span />
