Answer:According to the article, when companies earn patents specifically to prevent competition, it hinders the innovation of products that might actually be better. For instance, Bruce Nolop describes how his company had to pay more attention to the "minefield of existing patents than on the expected value that we could bring to customers." Rosabeth Moss Kanter suggests a "use it or lose it" solution to this problem. She thinks that a company that patents an item would be forced to use the patented idea or product or risk losing the patent. This idea would encourage more competition and prevent patent abuse.
Explanation:
Answer:
35.92%
Explanation:
The computation of cost of not taking the cash discount is shown below:-
Discount percentage ÷ (100 - Discount percentage) × (360 ÷ (Full Allowed Payment Days - Discount Days))
= 3% ÷ 97% × 360 ÷ (50 - 19)
= 3% ÷ 97% × 360 ÷ 31
= 0.03093 × 11.61290
= 0.359187
= 35.92%
Therefore for computing Mr. Warner's cost of not taking the cash discount we applied the above formula.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question are the following:
<span>a trade bloc between Canada, U.S., and Mexico
a trade organization that equally benefits all nations
an agreement to only buy goods from the countries involved</span>
Hope my answer would be a great help for you. If you have more questions feel free to ask here at Brainly.
The AAA payed farmers to reduce their production in order to raise prices.
They are made out of industrial screwdriver blades and they have screws in them that help them seal up things that are broken