1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gemiola [76]
3 years ago
15

Which is an example of "Infotainment"?

History
1 answer:
dem82 [27]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<h3>A. The O. J. Simpson trial .</h3>

Explanation:

  • The Case of O.J Simpson trial was about O.J Simpson who was acquitted for the murder of his ex-wife. The trial lasted for about a year. It was telecast in the T.V with millions of viewers following the trial.
  • Soon, the trail became a show for infotainment where viewers watched it for both information and entertainment at the same time.
  • A television show called American Crime Story: The People v. O.J. Simpson which revolves around the trial around the trial of O.J. Simpson also surfaced in the year 2016 which has gained a lot of popularity.
You might be interested in
Someone pls help me I will make you Brainly
gayaneshka [121]

Answer- the Justinian code

7 0
3 years ago
What were 3 things that Britain changed in India after (not during) the Sepoy Rebellion?
alexira [117]

Answer:

(In 1858) England exiled experor Bahadur II to Burma, they banned a british company in India and someone royal in britain ruled India

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What new invention that was created during 1955-1975?
Finger [1]
The computer and or the telephone is the answer
6 0
4 years ago
Please help me
Greeley [361]

1. Bush-onomics Forever!

The GOP is desperate to avoid the Bush label—both broadly and in specific terms of reclaiming the mantle of fiscal responsibility—but their main economic policy proposal seems to be to ignite a deficit bomb by extending Bush’s tax cuts, which are due to expire this year. Here’s a political definition of chutzpah: Argue against $30 billion in unemployment extensions in the name of fiscal discipline while pushing for a tax cut extension that would cost $2 trillion over 10 years.

2. Diving Back Onto the Third Rail

Tax cuts aren’t the only economic idea recycled from the Bush years. Remember the stupendously failed attempt to privatize Social Security? Not only do the likes of Angle, Paul, and former half-term Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin embrace the idea, so does Rep. Paul Ryan, the Wisconsin Republican who would become the chairman of the Budget Committee if the GOP takes over the House.

3. Unhealthy Attraction to Repeal

The Republicans are becoming not simply the “party of no,” but the party of repeal. We knew about their fixation on repealing healthcare reform. Admittedly there is a certain political logic here. While the gap has narrowed, voters still view the bill negatively. But the GOP would still be hard pressed to explain why they want, for example, insurance companies to be able to discriminate based on pre-existing conditions.

4. Party of Wall Street

They’ve also added the Wall Street reform bill, which Obama just signed into law, to their repeal target list. This one is harder to figure. An April ABC News/Washington Post poll showed two-thirds of Americans support stricter financial regulation. Is the GOP really ready to embrace its heritage as the party of Wall Street?that up there is for republican

this on is for democratic:

1. Repealing Bush's Tax Cuts

The fight over the expiring Bush tax cuts couldn't have come at a better time for Republicans. President Obama wants to raise taxes on individuals making more than $250,000 a year while leaving the middle class tax cuts intact. According to Congress's official tax scorekeeper, over 50 percent of those classified as "wealthy" are small business owners who employ millions of Americans, including many in the middle class. At a time of record unemployment, the Democratic Party is willing to place more economic burden on their backs through higher taxes instead of investing in their growth. Recently, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and leading Senate Democrats like Kent Conrad and Evan Bayh have said the last thing we should be doing in a recession is raising taxes, particularly on small businesses.

. Federal Spending

The federal deficit has exploded since President Obama took office. Much of that red ink hinges on a massive financial rescue package and economic stimulus measures. Those two bills combined cost nearly $1.5 trillion. In addition, the new healthcare reform package signed into law will cost another trillion. And nothing is being done to control America’s record $13 trillion debt. Washington’s spending spree is such an addiction that Democrats have canceled passing a federal budget that would help bring back fiscal sanity.

3. The Cap-and-Trade Fantasy

The cap-and-trade policy authored by Sens. John Kerry and Joe Lieberman has split the Democratic Party. The refusal to give up on creating a carbon-based trading system has robbed them of passing a real energy policy that would help bring down costs and make America more independent from foreign oil. Instead, it would increase energy taxes and create even more unemployment. While Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has shelved it for now, there is hope among many Democrats that it will be brought back up for passage after the election during a lame duck session.

4. Politicizing Immigration Policy

The inability of the federal government to control our borders combined with the effort by the Obama White House to politicize the issue has resulted in a national powder keg over immigration. Arizona Governor Jan Brewer’s decision to enforce the law and the Justice Department’s lawsuit against the state has exposed the ever growing dilemma. Instead of finding real policy solutions, the calculated move by the White House to attack Arizona’s new policy in an effort to fire up the Hispanic vote has backfired among voters. According to a recent Gallup Poll, more Americans and especially independent voters support Arizona’s attempt to control the problem.

Explanation:

<u><em> itplz mark  brainlist need of it</em></u>

8 0
4 years ago
What was the three-fifths compromise at the constitutional convention
IgorC [24]

Answer: B. only <em>three-fifths</em> of the enslaved population would be counted when calculating each state's representation in Congress.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention. The question was whether the slave population would count when determining a state total's population number, which would be used to determine the number of seats that each state would have in the House of Representatives.

The compromise that was reached was to count every three out of five slaves as a person for this purpose. It gave the Southern states a third more seats in Congress than if slaves had been ignored.




4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What overturned the ruling in Barron vs Baltimore
    6·2 answers
  • Do you think the United States would have gone to war with Spain without the explosion of the Maine? Why or why not?
    12·1 answer
  • What's A good introduction about lelin and Stalin
    13·1 answer
  • An a0 is an agreed truce or temporary end of hostilities.
    13·2 answers
  • How did the Soviet Union support the efforts of the Communist parties in Eastern Europe and cross the Democratic parties?
    9·1 answer
  • One of the primary purposes of the war in afghanistan that was waged during the george w. bush administration was to __________.
    15·1 answer
  • BRAINLIESTT ! <br> PLEASE ANSWER ASAP :))))
    15·1 answer
  • What was the significance of the Law of the Twelve Tables? These laws provided Romans with a legal precedent for electing an emp
    11·1 answer
  • What was the answer to California's isolation problem?
    9·1 answer
  • Who is the official head of the Senate? *
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!