1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
bogdanovich [222]
2 years ago
5

What would happen if there was no appellate process?

History
1 answer:
Oksana_A [137]2 years ago
4 0
The appellate courts have the power and authority to review the decisions of the trial court, and any judgment won in the trial court. The appellate court will review those decisions for legal or factual errors, and have the power to change the decision or judgment of the trial court. Many problems would be without this process
You might be interested in
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! What happened to the 6th Massachusetts when they came to Baltimore? What was the result?
Pie

They got into a major confrontation with the confederates.

Explanation:

The 6th Massachusets became the first union unit to take casualties in action on April 19th, 1861.

6 0
2 years ago
List at least two ideas that Richard White's The Middle Ground sought to oust.​
Inessa [10]
White examines the "middle ground" as both a place (the pays d'en haut of the Great Lakes region between 1650-1815) and a process of mutual accommodation between Algonquian-speaking Indians and French, British, and Americans. The middle ground consisted of creative misunderstandings in which Indians and Europeans attempted to build a set of mutually understandable practices. Several conditions are necessary for a middle ground process: a nonfunctioning or weak state authority, a relatively evenly-balanced distribution of power between peoples, the inability of one side to effectively use force over the other, and the need or desire to interact with one another (such as for trade goods). Both sides then try to engage in practices that the other side might find intelligible, such as European leaders consciously taking on the role of a patriarch that distributes gifts, mediates conflicts, and "covers" violent deaths. Indians, meanwhile, began participating in a market economy, compromised on legal punishments, and submitted to a limited degree to European oversight. The middle ground took place on both formal diplomatic levels (European powers budgeting for gift-giving) and the more everyday scale of individual interactions (sex and violence). People on both sides tried to justify their actions in terms of what they THOUGHT the other side's cultural framework to be (creative misunderstandings). Perhaps the best example is that of how they treated homicide, with both sides compromising - Europeans would sometimes cover the dead, while Indians would sometimes allow for individual perpetrators to be punished.

The narrative arc of The Middle Ground begins with a story of refugees, as Algonquian-speaking Indians flee northward from brutal warfare at the hands of the Iroquois during the 1640s-1660s. This places them in the orbit of French traders and missionaries and allow for the middle ground to flourish. The first half of the eighteenth century was a golden age for the middle ground, as Algonquians developed a relationship with Onontio (the title for a French governor) in which he was expected to act as a father in disbursing gifts and mediating conflicts. During this period the fur trade became deeply entangled with gift-giving, representing a hybrid form of exchange that was necessary for the system to function for both sides. During the 1740s and 1750s the French-Algonquian alliance began to weaken with increased competition from British. White drives home the point that in the pays d'en haut local, village politics were inseparable from imperial politics - instead of a hierarchical system of competing nation-states, the world of the middle ground took place between village alliances, intermarriages, and the decisions of specific chiefs that ended up reverberating across imperial politics.
6 0
3 years ago
Can Congress overturn a Supreme Court ruling with a 2/3 vote
Anna11 [10]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

The Supreme Court is out of the jurisdiction of Congress

3 0
2 years ago
YALL I HAVE 55 MISSING ASSIGNMENTS BAHAHAHAHHSHAHAHA- MY MOM IS DISAPPOINTED AT ME IM IN PAINNNN
Advocard [28]

Explanation:

do your 55 missing assignments then >:O

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who are the philoffsifers (idek how to spell )
Jet001 [13]
<span>A philosopher is someone who practices philosophy, which involves rational inquiry into areas that are outside of either theology or science. </span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did parents allow their children to work for child laborers in such hazardous conditions?
    12·2 answers
  • Why did americans consider cesar chavez a hero in the 60's and 70's
    9·1 answer
  • During the war, where did african americans recieve the best treatment?
    8·2 answers
  • Who dicovered college
    6·2 answers
  • What type of government must America have in order to stay peaceful?
    13·2 answers
  • Minutes ago
    15·1 answer
  • Who was 21 president​
    8·1 answer
  • You are the treasure of your class. They principal trust you to fix the state council's bank account. Unfortunately, a you have
    5·1 answer
  • 100 POINTS!!!!! help me with this and I swear on my life and everything I will give u 100 points, check my profile points if u d
    15·1 answer
  • Pls make sure you say why or why not
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!