1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
RSB [31]
3 years ago
9

What was William Johnson's view of American Indians? American Indians are more complex and dangerous than most Europeans realize

. American Indian tribes have pledged their loyalty to Britain and can be exploited. American Indians can be easily conquered and do not pose a serious threat. American Indian tribes are deadly but lack a great deal of wit or intelligence.
History
2 answers:
fredd [130]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:AS THE TITLE STATES, this essay will look closely at Johnson's role in the colonial development of America, and particularly the key concern over westward expansion. This became fundamentally linked with the differing views the British government and the colonial authorities held, over how this expansion should be managed, and in particular the financial cost of such a policy. This led, inexorably it seems, to the wider issues that then escalated into the Revolution and the fight for independence. Although Johnson died before the Revolution actually started, he was a key participant in the events that led up to this break with Britain, and as such the motives and actions of this man can give a picture of how the colonies and Britain viewed the future of America. This essay will look briefly at his early life in America, and then in more detail at the military and political career of Johnson, and particularly his involvement with the Indians, in his capacity as Superintendent of Indian Affairs, which was central to the British concerns over colonial expansion, and how that was to be managed. The military career of Johnson naturally evolved around his relationship with the Indians, especially the Six Nations, and earned him great success and wealth, after his victories at Lake George and Niagara. His political career progressed alongside his military one, and again was linked to his relationship with the Indians, through his appointment as Indian Superintendent. His relationship with the authorities in London, the colonial authorities, the settlers and traders, and with the Indians themselves, will be examined to form a portrait of Johnson, and how he saw the situation regarding westward expansion and all its implications for Britain and his adopted country, America. Finally some conclusions will be given based on Johnson'sSir William Johnson

circa 1751

AT THE AGE OF TWENTY-THREE Johnson left Ireland to seek his own way in America. He was aided by his uncle, Peter Warren, and went to the colonies with others who had decided to start afresh in the New World. Johnson's ability to get along with people and motivate them was rewarded soon after he arrived: in 1738 he had taken twelve families over to settle on his uncle's land in the Mohawk River valley; by 1742 there were twenty-six leases in operation. Johnson became a merchant, dealing and trading with the Indians, and building up, through trust and goodwill, the relationship that was to be the focal point of his life in America and also the main contributor to his subsequent fame and success. He bought his own land, across the river from his uncle's property, and continued to expand his business interests, which were mainly concerned with the fur trade and supplying the settlers in the Mohawk valley. This business gave Johnson the opportunity to understand the Indians: it was his special relationship with the Six Nations, and specifically with the Mohawks of the Iroquois Confederacy, that led him into the political and military arenas, and was to influence his subsequent ideas of how the colonies should manage the whole question of trade and expansion. This quality was early on recognised by the political leaders of the two colonies Johnson was primarily concerned with - Massachusetts and New York. In 1746 Governor Clinton of New York gave Johnson the task of supplying the vital garrison at Oswego. In the same year Johnson was appointed Commissary for Indian Affairs. Governor Shirley also saw Johnson's ability in dealing with the Indians; in 1754 he wrote to Johnson stating he would recommend him to be appointed in the capacity best suited to his talent. The result was that in 1755 Johnson received a warrant of appointment as Superintendent of Indian Affairs, with full powers to treat with the Confederate Nations in the British interest, from the Commander - in - Chief, Major General Braddock. AS WELL AS THIS POLITICAL ROLE Johnson had acquired a military handling of his difficult task, and how this affected subsequent events. One also.

Explanation: Read this and you'll get your answer~

Sonbull [250]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: A) American Indians are more complex and dangerous than most Europeans realize.

You might be interested in
Why was the bessemer process important to the industrial revolution?
aleksandrvk [35]
The Bessemer process was the first inexpensive industrial process for the mass production of steel from molten pig iron before the development of the open hearth Furnace .the key principle is removal of impurities from the iron by oxidation with air being blown through the molten iron
3 0
3 years ago
What did the United States do in response to increasing political conflict in Europe?
Karolina [17]

Answer:

But as the second post-Cold War decade opens, it is becoming increasingly clear that doing anything less will erode the foundation of the very alliance both ...

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What was chutes and ladders called in ancient india?.
gulaghasi [49]

Answer:

<em>Moksha Patam</em>

Explanation:

<em>The game originated in ancient India as </em><em>Moksha Patam</em><em>, and was brought to the UK in the 1890s. </em>

<em>I hope this helps and have a good day!</em>

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did United States citizens field that Japanese internment camps were justified during World War Two
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer:

Japanese internment camps were established during World War II by President Franklin Roosevelt through his Executive Order 9066. From 1942 to 1945, it was the policy of the U.S. government that people of Japanese descent would be interred in isolated camps.

The Japanese had just attacked Pearl Harbor (7 December 1941) US citizens feared another attack and war hysteria seized the country. Many feared the Japanese had connections within the U.S.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of these is not something soldiers were expected to do when they were not fighting or migrating to another location?
seraphim [82]

<em> A.) Improving Roman infrastructures.</em>

<em>When they were moving to another location Roman soldiers did not have to improve on other Roman infrastructures they came upon along the way, because the building of the infrastructures was not organized by the Roman troops, more so they were organized by an architect and the architect's workers.</em>

<em>The reason I also chose A was because the Roman troops traveled in their groups and whenever they were injured it was up to them to man the camp hospitals to heal the wounded. Also recruiting more soldiers along the way was also very helpful to the Roman legion and allowed a much broader amount of soldiers that could be used for taking over land. Not to mention that soldiers (traveling strictly inside their troops) were responsible for feeding themselves (what I'm saying is that the troops were responsible for cooking and feeding each other I just used "themselves" as the word to describe it).</em>

<em>Since Roman soldiers traveled in groups they did not (I'm assuming here I don't know for sure) take women or other people along with them and they only took the amount of soldiers that were assigned by their higher ups. In other words Roman soldiers were really only expected to do as they were ordered to (in modern times any disobedience to what they were ordered to do would have resulted in them having it put on a disaplinary record, but they did not do that sort of thing during Roman times meaning that they punished the soldiers in ways that I don't factually now about). Basically the key importance in the Roman soldier was to carry out the order he received and complete the order quickly and efficiently. However, they did recruit soldiers along the way as they were instructed and that was to help them benefit for taking over land. The commanding officer was the one who told the Roman soldiers what to do when they were traveling (simple tasks, not the task assigned by the current ruler) and the soldiers were expected to complete it. A few of the tasks assigned by the commanding officer could have been to cook, preform healing measures, and recruit more soldiers.</em>

<em>Hope this helps.</em>

<em>-Northstar</em>

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was emmet till and why was he killed?
    5·2 answers
  • Match each term with its correct definition.
    15·1 answer
  • Which of these BEST describes the advice George Washington gave Americans about relationships with foreign powers in his Farewel
    8·2 answers
  • Which of the following claims does Napoleon make about religion in the document al-Jabarti quotes in the second paragraph? The F
    11·1 answer
  • What was the result of the american tactic of fighting to hurt the british, rather than to gain territory?
    5·1 answer
  • Please help me quickly i’ll give brainiest as well
    7·2 answers
  • What kind of law would be important enough for you to protest it? (Personal opinion)
    6·1 answer
  • What is nolka's response when she first meets the chenoo?
    5·1 answer
  • When and where was the wheel invented?
    7·1 answer
  • What effect can third party candidates have on elections?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!