Answer:
Investor A = $545216 .
Investor B = $352377
Investor C = $897594
Explanation:
Annual rate ( r ) = 9.38%
N = 41 years
<u> Calculate the balance at age of 65</u>
1) For Investor A
balance at the end of 10 years
= $2000 (FIA, 9.38 %, 10) (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $33845
Hence at the end of 65 years ( balance )
= $33845 (FIP, 9.38 %, 31) ≈ $545216 .
2) For investor B
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 31) = $322159 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $352377
3) For Investor C
at the age of 65 years ( balance )
= $2000 (FIP, 9.38%, 41) = $820620 x (1 + 0.0938) ≈ $897594
Answer:
C) $300 U
Explanation:
Gipple Corporation
Material Quantity Variance = (Actual Quantity Used * Standard Unit Cost )-
( Standard Quantity Used * Standard Unit Cost )
Material Quantity Variance =(AQ* SP) -(SQ*SP)
Material Quantity Variance = (24,870* 6)- ( 7.3* 3400 *6)
Material Quantity Variance = (24,870* 6)- (24,820* 6)
Material Quantity Variance = 149220 - 148920
Material Quantity Variance = $300 Unfavorable
As actual quantity is greater than standard quantity it is unfavorable.
Answer:
Press a standard key on the keyboard.
Move the mouse.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. economies of scale.
Explanation:
The economies of scale is the scale where the company has the advantage of the cost that reaped by the organization in the case when there is an efficient production. It could be accomplished when the level of production or the volume of the production rises by lowering the cost
Therefore as per the given situation, the option A is correct as it fits to the current situation
Hence, the correct option is A.
Answer:
D : $600,000 loss
Explanation:
In the income statement, the total revenues and the total expenses are recorded.
If the total revenues are more than the total expenditure then the company earns net income
And, If the total revenues are less than the total expenditure then the company have a net loss
This net income or net loss would reflect in the statement of the retained earning account.
So,The net income or net loss would be
= Net income - research and development costs
= $2,400,000 - $3,000,000
= $600,000 loss
