1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
daser333 [38]
4 years ago
15

explain how the issue of spoils or patronage in the gilded age is similar to politics in the jackson era

History
1 answer:
Eddi Din [679]4 years ago
5 0

Spoil system is the term which was first used in the time of Andrew Jackson' presidentship. It was the cynical republicans who appeared to oppose corruption but in reality they created a corrupt entrenched administrative bureaucracy.

Explanation:

Andrew Jackson ensured that he too enough measures to annihilate corruption in his office. Basically, loyalty played a dominant role in offering highest offices in the presidential office rather than skill and expertise which is a back lash during the gilded age. Biased bureaucracy which gave importance to party loyalty took a major role in crating an administration which failed to recognize the knowledge, talent and expertise.

During Jackson' era many measures  such as Sherman antitrust laws were also passed to stop monopoly which helped corruption to grow indirectly in the society. Southern reconstruction, civil rights movement and rise of labor unions were all the aftereffects of the gilded age.

You might be interested in
PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!!! I WILL GIVE THE BRAINLIEST
julsineya [31]

Answer:

1. President Theodore Roosevelt’s big stick policy was used by the United States to negotiate an agreement for an American-led canal through Panama, spread American influence in Cuba, and broker a peace treaty between Russia and Japan. Big Stick diplomacy is the policy which refers to a carefully mediated negotiation "speak softly, and carry a big stick." and Roosevelt won the Nobel Peace Prize for it in 1906.

2.

<em>The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.  </em>

<u>President Theodore Roosevelt named its foreign dominant policy, “Big stick policy”. He believed in this policy was the best to apply in Latin America and the Caribbean countries. On the other hand, President William Howard Taft created the Dollar diplomacy. It generated financial aid to support a Latin American region in order to maintain and control the trade and financial interest of the U.S. But people in Latin America did not like the U.S. intervention and many rebellions and uprisings were part of the reactions to these policies. So, The results of the Big stick policy, Dollar diplomacy, and Moral diplomacy in Latin America made people in Latin America were angry at U.S. actions.  </u>

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did Portugal supply weapons to the Nationalists in Spain?
yuradex [85]
Because Portugal became one of the most important allies of Spain. The prime minister of Portugal knwon as Salazar was supporting the army of Franco. Many dissidents of Portugal were protected in Spain and, even though the relations were a little bit tense, Portugal gave their full support giving aircraft as an aid to Franco in Spain. Salazar<span> reassured Franco and his allies that no interference would hinder the supply traffic directed to the Nationals. </span>  
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the name of the shellfish that yields a purple dye
dangina [55]
◼️ Question <span>◼️

</span><span>What is the name of the shellfish that yields a purple dye?

</span>◼️ Answer ◼️

The name of the shellfish that yields a purple dye is called murex.

<span>Hope that helps! ★ <span>If you have further questions about this question or need more help, feel free to comment below or leave me a PM. -UnicornFudge aka Nadia </span></span>
6 0
3 years ago
imagine that on june 28 1914 as gavrilo princip was about the shoot archduke ferdinand, his gun jammed and the archduke survived
Advocard [28]

Answer:

No, i don't think it would happen

Austria and Serbia has been involved in several conflict even before the world war 1. They involved in economic conflicts in early 1900s that make the tension between the two countries became quite high, but they still do not have any proper reason to initiate war with one another.

The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand became a perfect trigger for the people who want the war to break out. It became really easy for them to gained support from the citizens to initiate an attack toward Serbia, which lead to the world war 1.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
During the 700s, most of Spain was conquered by the __________.
Burka [1]
The answer would be Muslims
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Prior to the 1900 what were the main sources of transportation in the cities
    6·2 answers
  • Do you think the United States involvement in Vietnam was justified?
    5·2 answers
  • Starting in the Middle East, which of these describes the direction in which Islam spread after the death of Muhammad?
    8·1 answer
  • What happened to World War I veterans as a result of the Depression?
    6·2 answers
  • Which do you think is more important to child development. Nature or nurture? Help asap!!!
    5·2 answers
  • How to do this???? I need help
    10·1 answer
  • The Fertile Crescent is located in _____. Africa The Middle East China India
    5·2 answers
  • what term means great names and referred to the japanese noble families of the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries?
    12·1 answer
  • Need help whit history can come one help me
    11·2 answers
  • Which main goal is America's foreign policy designed to achieve? free trade. regulated banking. worker protections. national sec
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!