Question Options:
A) a hidden curriculum
B) tracking
C) credentialism
D) meritocracy
E) an achievement gap
Answer: Emily's separation from average students is a result of TRACKING
Explanation: Tracking in this context can be defined as the awareness of Emily especially as a result of close monitoring.
For her to be considered a bright student is as a result of close monitoring. Her further progress "large quantities of homework that was conceptually complicated" is also tracking in the sense that it observes and monitors.
I believe the correct answer is: high self-monitoring
Mark Snyder, American social psychologist, introduced the
concept of self-monitoring during the 1970s to show how much people monitor
their self-presentations, expressive behavior, and nonverbal affective displays.
He stated in his studies that self-monitoring can be:
1. high self-monitoring
2. low self-monitoring
High self-monitoring individuals closely monitor themselves
and behave in a manner that is highly responsive to social cues and their
situational context.
In this case, Sally is high self-monitoring as she examines
a situation for cues of how she should react, and then tries to meet the
demands of the situation rather than act on her own feelings, before she acts
or speaks.
Answer:
C I think
Explanation:
The hindus didn't change the caste system so its not a big difference because they didnt accomplish in changing the caste system. This was just a belief of the hindus im pretty sure
I THINK please wait for more responses if needed.
Yes we can
Generalization : a general statement made from a specific case
Specific case : China is a communist country
General Statement : All of the people that live in China don't have a freedom to choose their occupation
Explanation : in communist country , the government is the one that choose the jobs for the people, so we can make that general statement
