Mali was socially, politically, and economically similar to ghana, however, it was much smaller than ghana. True or false

History

1 answer:

Simora [160]3 years ago

7 0

This statement is False.

This statement Mali was socially, politically, and economically similar to Ghana, however, it was much smaller than Ghana is false.

Although both the empires are very much similar to each other,but the fact cannot be denied that Mali is far larger and prosperous country as compared to Ghana. Both the empires show similarities in terms of religious and economic matters. Economically Mali has great significance in trade than Ghana.

You might be interested in

How long did it take to inspire other cities to create their own sewage systems?

irga5000 [103]

<u>Own sewage systems After the Public Health Act;</u>

The 1848 Public Health Act was the absolute first law on general wellbeing to be passed in the United Kingdom. It set up a Central Board of Health whose activity it was to improve sanitation and expectations for everyday comforts in towns and crowded territories in England and Wales.

Its motivation was to arrange past measures planned for fighting messy urban living conditions, which caused different wellbeing dangers, including the spread of numerous illnesses, for example, cholera and typhus.

In July 1842, the most significant nineteenth Century production on social change was discharged, titled, 'Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Laboring Population of Great Britain'.

This investigation into sanitation was the mind offspring of a legal counselor, Edwin Chadwick (1800-1890). It took such huge numbers of years for the administration to move different urban areas to make their own sewage frameworks.

3 0

3 years ago

What was the turning point of the Battle of Gettysburg?

Mila [183]

I Think The answer is a I hope it helps My friend Message Me if I’m wrong and I’ll change My answer and fix it for you

3 0

3 years ago

Although the Constitution protects the freedom of speech for all citizens in the U.S., certain types of speech are not protected

avanturin [10]

While many Americans know that they have a right to free speech, the lay opinion often views the degree of protection afforded by the United State Constitution as much broader than it is in reality. The First Amendment does not protect all types of speech.

The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech.” While it states “Congress,” the protections are also against state government and local public officials from making any law that abridges a person’s freedom of speech. However, simply because the government cannot make a law of this nature does not mean that individuals are free to say anything that they want to. For example, employers may prohibit certain types of speech that would not violate a person’s First Amendment rights if the employer was not a public employer.

So I believe the answers would either be B or C (:

Thanks me and mark as brainliest (:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which statement best describes the US government‘s role with the banking industry at the beginning of the depression

Paladinen [302]

You need to give more information on the question.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If you had to give up one of them democratic principles in the bill of rights which one would you choose?