Answer:
he's a good person and he tried to help us out as much as he could
Explanation:
he tried to do things and not all of us liked it but it was for the best he tried to be a good president even though he won more than 70 million votes but many found the manner in which he defied so many norms off putting and often offensive and also by sundown of his first full day, it was clear Trump would seek to change the presidency, more than the presidency would change him bad things he did was... H ridiculously claimed out country to be FULL but we are not, He used anti-Semitic troops to attack his enemies but he was right to do that, He said the Soviet Union was right to invade Afghanistan and congratulated China on the 70th anniversary of the Communist takeover it was not right to do that, He lost a needless government shutdown fight instead of just taking the deal like he should of, He used his emergency authority to circumvent Congress on the border wall after he lost the shutdown fight, He continued to spread the canard that the USA is fighting an endless war,He continued to attack dead people, He asked the president of Ukraine to investigate Hunter Biden NOT RIGHT, He invited the Taliban to camp David, He gave Turkey a green light to invade Syria and attack out Kurdish allies. But the good things he did was... He continued to deliver for the forgotten Americans, He implemented tighter work requirements for food stamps, He has got NATO allies to cough up more money for our collective security, He stood with the people of Hong Kong, His withdrawal from the Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces INF treaty is delivering china and north Korea a strategic setback, His maximum pressure campaign is crippling Iran, His tariff threats forced mexico to crack down on illegal immigration, He delivered the biggest blow to planned parenthood in three decades, He ordered the operation that killed Islamic state leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, and He has continued to appoint conservative judges at a record pace.
So like what are you needing help on like wats the theme or
Answer:
D). Antonyms.
Explanation:
The authors provide context clues which are hints or clues that assist the readers to define the meaning of an unusual or unfamiliar word.
In the given example, <u>the antonym('a word with the opposite or contradictory meaning of the given words') of 'propaganda' would best help the audience to define it</u>. The opposite meaning('antonym') of propaganda is 'truth, fact, or reality' which is signaled by words like 'honest, fact-based reading.' It helps the reader define that 'propaganda' is 'biased or manipulated information intended to influence people' as the Guilder people were forced to read it who used to read facts or reality(opposite of 'propaganda') earlier. Thus, <u>option D</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
To Diana George, poverty is represented by non-profit organizations such Habitat for Humanity in a way of despair, or something that can be easily seen or recognized. Or in the case of this organization and many others, it tries as to find an surfire way to make others empathise with poverty. The problems George identifies as a result of this tactic is that poverty is not always easily recognized, and on even questions that “If it doesn’t look like poverty, then how do we adress it?” (p. 450) The largest, most pressing issue is that seeing poverty in one way instead limits our understanding on how to deal with poverty.
At the very beginning of the article, George creates an anecdote of how she encounters charities. It details her going through her mail and looking over many other poverty organization’s mail. This shows their tactic, of presenting poverty as grim and ragged, while a quote from bell hooks before that states that seeing poverty in one way challenges how people look and deal with it. Providing these two largely contrasting viewpoints, in a way, makes them appeal to different audiences by expressing both her issue and a counterclaim to structure the remainder of textual analysis.
The purpose of George’s textual analysis is to ultimately show that representing poverty as weak and depraving only hinders the fight against it instead of resolving it. Everyday, it’s a question of who is poor and who is not, but that itself is becoming increasingly difficult to tell. This rudimentary mindset eventually leads George to state that “There are certainly many cultural and political reasons for these problems…but I would suggest that the way the way poverty countinues to be represented in this country and on tapes limits our understanding.” So if people continue to see poverty in this sight, the ones that are poor but still have a home or job will challenge this belief. People will not know how to deal with them, and this essentially why George criticizes non-profit organizations such as Health for Habitat
an account of a person's life written by that person.
