Answer:
I would choose to be a writer.
Explanation:
I find the way authors paint pictures with words to be amazing, and the way they create worlds is awesome too.
<span>If we have to rationalize EVERYTHING, then mankind would never have the potential to develop anything unique or worthwhile. We would be clamped to the ground and be striken in a world without change. Some of the smartest people in the world didn't think. tell me if that was the answer u were lookin for
</span>
The women ran the longhouses, and owned all the normal things of everyday life such as blankets (skins), cooking utensils, and farming tools. A longhouse was usually occupied by one clan, with the eldest and/or <em>most respected woman of that clan ruling it as Clan Mother. </em>The women were highly respected.Please mark as brainliest,i need 3 more to rank up <3
The theme of The Adventures of Theseus is B: It is as important to be thoughtful as well as brave.
Theseus was a brave young man called Theseus, who went on a journey to Athens. His mother begged him to travel by sea, not over land it was dangerous travelling over land. He insisted on travelling over land and met several robbers and bandits along the way. He handled each situation he found himself in, along the way, with thought and bravery. As a result, he arrived in Athens unscathed.
Answer:
Summary Of Rethinking The Wild By Christopher Solomon Essay
1530 Words7 Pages
Humanity co-exists with nature in a relationship that periodically shifts between symbiotic and parasitic. We maintain this relationship in order to survive. In exchange, we carefully monitor how our behavior alters the natural environment and affects those living within it. This responsibility is the price we pay for our species’ sentience and dominance. To help fulfill our duty, America established the 1954 Wilderness Act in hopes of becoming passive “guardians” of nature instead of encroaching “gardeners.” However, the Wilderness Act has failed. In his article, “Rethinking the Wild”, Christopher Solomon questions the effectiveness of the law and correctly concludes that, after fifty years of dormancy, mankind must take an active role in environmental protection, the role of the gardener. Though critics may argue that the passivity of the “guardian” should be maintained, realistically, little can be done to preserve the environment when we refuse to do anything. Because mankind has a greater stake in the wilderness than we realize, we must assume a proactive role in protecting the wilderness out of respect for nature and our own ethical standards.
Boundaries and Investments
Assume for the sake of our argument that nature holds no intrinsic value. Why, then, is the wilderness worth protecting? Truthfully, the wilderness can be a valuable indicator of the planet’s overall health, which is not easily gauged in industrialized and populated areas due to human influence.
