1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Helga [31]
4 years ago
12

Why did the inca have representatives of the central government study the societies of newly conquered areas?

History
2 answers:
ruslelena [56]4 years ago
7 0

The inca had representatives of the central government study the societies of newly conquered areas to take an inventory of their resources so they could be taxed in the most efficient way. Option D is correct.

The Inca civilization developed in ancient Peru between c. 1400 and 1533 CE, and their empire extended across western South America from Quito in the north to Santiago in the south, turning it into the greatest empire that ever existed in the Americas.

Anit [1.1K]4 years ago
3 0
The correct answer is "D"
You might be interested in
Identify the early stages taken during the criminal law process.
ivolga24 [154]

Arrest

Criminal prosecution typically begins with an arrest by a police officer. A police officer may arrest a person if (1) the officer observes the person committing a crime; (2) the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by that person; or (3) the officer makes the arrest under the authority of a valid arrest warrant. After the arrest, the police books the suspect. When the police complete the booking process, they place the suspect in custody. If the suspect commited a minor offense, the policy may issue a citation to the suspect with instructions to appear in court at a later date.

Bail

If a suspect in police custody is granted bail, the suspect may pay the bail amount in exchange for a release. Release on bail is contingent on the suspect's promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings. Bail may be granted to a suspect immediately after booking or at a later bail review hearing. Alternatively, a suspect may be released on his "own recognizance." A suspect released on his own recognizance need not post bail, but must promise in writing to appear at all scheduled court appearances. Own recognizance release is granted after the court considers the seriousness of the offense, and the suspect's criminal record, threat to the community and ties to family and employment.

Arraignment

The suspect makes his first court appearance at the arraignment. During arraignment, the judge reads the charges filed against the defendant in the complaint and the defendant chooses to plead "guilty," "not guilty" or "no contest" to those charges. The judge will also review the defendant's bail and set dates for future proceedings.

Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Proceedings

The government generally brings criminal charges in one of two ways: by a "bill of information" secured by a preliminary hearing or by grand jury indictment. In the federal system, cases must be brought by indictment. States, however, are free to use either process. Both preliminary hearings and grand juries are used to establish the existence of probable cause. If there is no finding of probable cause, a defendant will not be forced to stand trial.

A preliminary hearing, or preliminary examination, is an adversarial proceeding in which counsel questions witnesses and both parties makes arguments. The judge then makes the ultimate finding of probable cause. The grand jury, on the other hand, hears only from the prosecutor. The grand jury may call their own witnesses and request that further investigations be performed. The grand jury then decides whether sufficient evidence has been presented to indict the defendant.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions are brought by both the prosecution and the defense in order to resolve final issues and establish what evidence and testimony will be admissible at trial.

Trial

At trial, the judge or the jury will either find the defendant guilty or not guilty. The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal trial. Thus, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crimes charged. The defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial in most criminal matters. A jury or judge makes the final determination of guilt or innocence after listening to opening and closing statements, examination and cross-examination of witnesses and jury instructions. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case will either be dismissed or a new jury will be chosen. If a judge or jury finds the defendant guilty, the court will sentence the defendant.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following shows a similarity in the business practices of John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie?
brilliants [131]

Answer:

niwji29snmejfjakkkwmmz

4 0
3 years ago
Chapter 30
mezya [45]

Answer:

    "Thousands of Americans were killed, wounded, imprisoned, made gravely ill, or driven to death (suiside) by the war. The government finally abolished the draft, which had been a point of great controversy during most of the war (“Working Class War”), and placed limits on the president’s powers through the War Powers Act of 1973 (president must inform Congress within 48 hours of deploying troops and 90 day maximum deployment without Congressional approval). During much of the war, Americans were deeply divided (Living-Room War). Those who supported (hawks) and those who opposed (doves) the war often felt great hostility toward one another. Americans developed a more cynical attitude toward government and politicians as a result of war-related lies, deceptions, and questionable activities carried out by the Johnson and Nixon administrations (Pentagon Papers). Americans became more cautious about foreign policy decisions that might require sending US troops to intervene in other nations’ affairs."

Explanation:

(Found on Google)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the immediate goal of the Standard Oil Company when it lowered its prices?
marissa [1.9K]
B to out compete rival businesses as if they lowered their prices more than their competitors, they could drag in more customers
8 0
3 years ago
Counter reformation succeed
Naily [24]

The Counter-Reformation was successful in certain areas. For instance, it was largely able to eliminate the spread of Protestantism in Austria and France. These two areas had large numbers of Protestants during the Reformation, but their numbers had severely dwindled by the end of the Thirty Years' War.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does "wyd" mean?
    5·2 answers
  • What protections were included in the Fourteenth Amendment?
    5·1 answer
  • Read the passage. excerpt from "Remarks on East-West Relations at Brandenburg Gate in West Berlin" by Ronald Regan But in the We
    15·2 answers
  • Why are there 2 political parties in America
    11·1 answer
  • The _____ ______ marked the mass movement of African Americans who fled the rural South for the urban North
    8·1 answer
  • The first of the former republics of the Soviet Union to be recognized as completely independent
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following has a nonvoting delegate in the house of representatives
    14·1 answer
  • What happens to the food supply as the population gets larger?
    12·1 answer
  • Saaang larangan kabilang ang mahabharata at ramayana?
    8·2 answers
  • Is this right? Please help me
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!