Answer:
The U.S had many motives to have intervene in the war. The united states was correct in intervening in the Korean war because they feared if a nation falled to communism then other nearby nations might do the same. Tensions regarding communism were at an all time high and not intervening in the fight agaisnt communism might have looked bad and incited more fear.
Explanation:
i dk
Answer:
- He granted suffrage to women
- He established schools
- He created a court system similar to European countries
Explanation:
Mustafa Kemal was a man that made lot of reforms in Turkey. One of his prime goals was to modernize and Westernize the country, with the Western European systems being taken as an example. In order to achieve this, he opened up lot of new schools where children of all social classes can go, as he was aware that he needed educated nation. Another big thing implemented, especially for a Muslim country, was that the women were granted equal rights as men, and they were given the right to vote as well, which was not seen fondly by the religious authorities. The court system was an old one that was not practical anymore, not to mention corrupt, so it was to changed by the example of the Western courts. It is no wonder why he is seen as the father of the modern Turkish nation, and why pretty much everyone is respecting and adoring him in the country.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
There is no question here. It is just a statement.
However, doing some research we can say that the proper question for this statement is the following: <em>"Is Mark's service in a jury a responsibility or an obligation?"</em>
If that is the case, then the correct answer is "an obligation."
According to the laws of the state, an individual who is summoned by the state to be part of a jury has the obligation to attend. If he or she does not attend, he should be fined according to the law. If the individual cannot attend, it has to be for a very important situation that has to be explained. Otherwise, the state will consider his +/her negativity to attend as a contempt of court.
Answer: The order of these conflicts was slavery, immigration then annexation
<h3>
mark brainliest please</h3>
