That would be written as:

And the step-by-step equation would be:
→ we take the 2 to the right side of the equation and do the IO*
→we solve for 
→ final answer
*Ps - IO is not an existing term and stands for inverse operation. In this case, because when we take to 2 to the right side of the equation (the 2 is a power) it'll have to turn into a square root (because exponents and roots are inverse operations)
Hope it helped,
BioTeacher101
ANSWER

EXPLANATION
To find the expression that is equivalent to

we must first expand

Then we rearrange to find the required expression.
So let's get started.

We expand the parenthesis on the right hand side to get,

We expand again to obtain,

Let us group the cubed terms on the right hand side to get,


We make the cubed terms the subject,

We factor to get,

We expand the bracket on the left hand side to get,

We finally simplify to get,
Option 2.
1. Simplify 7 + (12 - 9) + 7 × 3(8 - 5)
According to the Order of Operations, contents of parentheses are evaluated first. This gives
... 7 + 3 + 7 × 3 × 3
Then multiplication and division are performed left to right.
... = 7 + 3 + 21 × 3
... = 7 + 3 + 63
Followed by addition and subtraction left to right.
... = 10 + 63
... = 73
A Google search box can be relied upon to do the operations in the correct order.
_____
2. When the expression is rewritten, a different result is obtained. This is because the operations indicated by the second set of parentheses are altered.
... (7 + 12) - 9 + (7 × 3)8 - 5
... = 19 - 9 + 21 × 8 - 5
... = 19 - 9 + 168 - 5
... = 10 + 168 - 5
... = 178 - 5
... = 173
In the first expression, both +8 and -5 are multiplied by 21. In the rewritten expression, only +8 is multiplied by 21.
Answer:
-2/3
hope this helped you
please mark as the brainliest (ㆁωㆁ)
12.
It is easy all you have to do is 15-3 because 1+2=3