The given statement is False.
People who keep domestic animals are strictly liable for any harm inflicted by the animals.
Explanation:
People keep many type of animals as pets in their homes. Some of the common animals which are being kept as pets are:
So if animals kept by people in their homes harm someone, or something, then the owner of the animal is not liable for it. This is because the animal's behavior is not is control of the people. People can only train them, but to always obey the owner is not in the hands of the owner. The nature of animals may not always remain the same, they can cause harm to things or people, but because they are animals, so the owner is not liable.
For example, a man has a dog as pet and his dog went in the neighbor's garden and dig the soil. In this case the owner is not liable for the damage the dog caused. No doubt the owner could help the neighbor in settling the things together but he is not liable for the damage,
Learn more about animals at:
brainly.com/question/11013494
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer: Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain's policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. ... Appeasement was popular for several reasons. Chamberlain - and the British people - were desperate to avoid the slaughter of another world war.
Explanation:
1a. True
There a much higher population
1b. True
Puerto Rico is growing rapidly
Each of the following is part of the Lemon Test for determining whether state aid to church schools is constitutional except the <span>aid must not advance or inhibit religion. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". I hope it helps you.</span>
