Answer:
Love becomes the influencing factor for the princess and she did not want him to die but she also knows she can't have him get married to another woman. And debating between the two options, which either way will make sure she doesn't get him, she must decide on which door to choose from, with the man's full faith in her.
If I were in the princess's position, I would choose rather see him get married to the woman instead of leading him to his death. Even though there may be no future, the man still deserves to live and be alive and not be killed just because he fell in love with a princess.
Explanation:
In the short story "The Lady or The Tiger", the fate of the young man depends on the decision of the princess. And with his life on her hands, the author Frank R. Stockton leaves us with the big question of whether the princess led the young man to his death the tiger, or to the beautiful lady who will become his wife.
With the primary theme being love between the princess and the courtier who was from a lower social class, the notion of love becomes the most important aspect of the young man's life. And with his faith in her, the feeling of love supersedes the fear of choosing the wrong door. He has full faith in the princess's choice that is best for him. But the princess, on the other hand, has a lot to think about before deciding to lead her lover to the door he thinks is right for him. She has to choose to either see him get married to another woman or be killed by a tiger. And she even feels jealous to think of him getting married to another woman. This is what love does to a person, bringing in jealousy and hatred even to the point of killing the other person with the notion "if I can't have you, no one can". But at the same time, the author did not specify what door the princess leads the young man to, leaving us to conclude.
If the position to make the decision was on me, I think I will choose to keep him alive and rather see him married to another woman instead of killing him and taking his life. Taking the life of a person is not something that a person has the right to, and it is far better to see a person alive and secure instead of leading him to his death. Besides, living is our right and no one should be deprived of that unless they did a sinful deed worthy of death.
Answer: Hope this helps!
Verified answers. Verified answer from brainly are considered correct, but not to trust worthy. It could have 4.2 stars, 33 thanks, and be expert verified. This is why you should usually check other websites first, like quizlet. A verified answer means they could have got it right, and the expert could have got it right but they could have been using a different program. Do not trust verified answers, simply check another website and if they have the same answer, it is very possible it is correct.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
It was a fine day when I decided to go for hunting with my father so I went to convince him but when i entered in his room, I saw that he was sleeping. Then I had to go back to the parlor and wait him out. About an hour later, he was up as I saw him walking in the veranda. I walked up to him greeted and asked if I could go hunting with him.
Surprisingly, he agreed, saying he'd wanted to put it to me few weeks back but he didn't want it to seem as though he were coercing me. We took breakfast and set out to the woods behind our house and he taught me how to handle a gun. Of course I was shaking since I'd always steered clear of it. But after a few words, I did take the gun and hold it. He taught me to shoot also, but perhaps, I was wrong with my intuition on wanting to learn to hunt. I'd made only one shot and I was shivering. He had to take me back to the house that morning.
My first time outing was a disaster, but he told me not to worry about it that it happens. I haven't made up my mind if I'd go for another trial yet.
Answer:
C). Next to the noun it describes.
Explanation:
<u>A misplaced modifier is described as the formatting or structural error in which a word or clause is separated or isolated from the noun or pronoun it intends to describe/modify and rather describe an inadvertent word</u> that creates an ambiguous and misleading effect in the sentence.
Thus, such formatting error creates confusion due to the incorrect placement of the participial phrase(that functions to modify a noun or pronoun in the sentence). Therefore, in order to rectify this error of misplaced modifier and avoid such confusion, the participial phrase must be placed 'next to the noun it describes' so that it clarifies which noun or pronoun is being modified by the participial phrase in the sentence. Hence, <u>option C</u> is the correct answer.
Unfortunately without the writing, I can't tell 100% what the answer is. However, going off with what the sentence is I think the answer might be B. If the writing is all about winning with honor, and not cheating that would be the answer. However, it is the writing stages that cheating is just another way of winning than that wouldn't be the answer, it might be D then. It's a judgment call on your end.
