Answer:
B. Britain, France, Italy, and the United States
Explanation:
The "Big Four" refers to the four leaders at the Paris Peace Conference these leaders included, Woodrow Wilson, David Lloyd George, Georges Clemenceau, and Vittorio Orlando. These leaders represented the four aforementioned countries. They had the most power to achieve their goals.
Answer:
They were both Abolitionist
Explanation:
Henry was an Africans american abolitionist who escaped with his family as a child from slavery in maryland.
Maria was an essayist,lecturer,abolitionist womens rights activist.
<span>congress must establish a concrete connection betweeb a law's provision and interstate commerce before superseding policies that traditionally fall under state jurisdiction</span>
I'm not sure if this will help, but Twain was against imperialism. He spoke out against what happened in the Philippines during the Philippine-American War (in which rebels fought against the US for not recognizing them as a republic -- this after the Spanish American War) and was concerned over the direction that the country was taking with those actions. Keith, on the other hand, was a businessman and entrepreneur who eventually created the United Fruit Company. Through his business holdings in Costa Rica and the Central American region, his companies managed to influence a great deal of the local economy. Instead of using armies and soldiers to take over a country, his companies did the same thing -- through the economy -- turning many areas into private preserves that fed his business interests. In that way, he was definitely something of an imperialist.
<span>Considering the variety of movements covered in the section of your text entitled "The Rise in Cultural Nationalism how did American cultural life in the early nineteenth century reflect the Republican vision of the nation's future?
Jefferson and the Republicans championed the rights of the states and advocated a strict adherence to the Constitution, but once in office, they found new situations that demanded governmental actions that, in some cases, went beyond what the Federalists had done. What caused Jefferson and his party to change their approach to governing, what reservations did they have about what they were doing, and how were they able to rationalize this apparent change in program and philosophy? (Be sure to consult previous chapters when answering this question.)
How did the Federalists respond to Republican programs? If the Federalists favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, why did they protest when Jefferson used a loose interpretation as well? What was it in the Republican program that the Federalists saw as a threat, and how did they respond?
Many historians view the War of 1812 as the second American war for independence but is this an accurate characterization? In what way did British policies prior to 1812 threaten our independence? Had the United States not fought the war, what might the results have been? Assess these questions, and determine if the United States was indeed fighting for independence."</span>
