Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Answer:
Andrew Jackson was the seventh President of the United States from 1829 to 1837
Explanation:
May i ask why do you need this
Answer:
Providing personal customer service
Explanation:
Rudy provides his customers with very personalized service. His business model functions well because he has a sizeable amount of followers on his website. Rudy personally interacts with his customers, lets them knows his location and the menu for the day, and thanks them for their support. Since Rudy owns a food truck, he can move to different locations. By providing personalized customer service, Rudy is encouraging his followers to find where the food truck is located that day. This way, he gets the traffic of where the food truck is located that day, but he also has people that specifically go to that area for his food truck.
Answer:
I believe the answer is c
Explanation:
The correct answer is regression.
The child is regressing to a previous age when he used to wet the bed. He is now six years old, so he is supposed to be old enough not to wet the bed anymore, which was the case until his baby brother was born. Now the older child feels neglected and starts regressing to an earlier age in order to be noticed by his parents again.
